Cited by 96AI in Service InteractionsConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research

Anthropomorphism in hospitality and tourism: A systematic review and agenda for future research

Ding, Anni, Lee, Rachel Hyunkyung, Legendre, Tiffany S., Madera, Juan·2022·Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.07.018

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, A., Lee, R. H., Legendre, T. S., & Madera, J.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Ding, Anni
Venue
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
52
Pages
404-415
ISSN
1447-6770 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4291237173
Cited by
96
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Keywords
anthropomorphism, hospitality marketing, tourism marketing, brand anthropomorphism, customer experience, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review