Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,581

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A manifesto for the equifinality thesis

Open access
Beven, Keith·2006·Journal of Hydrology
DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Anderson, M G and Bates, P D (Eds.), Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science, Wiley: Chichester, 2001.
  2. Bashford, 2002, Model structures, observational data and robust, scale dependent parameterisations: explorations using a virtual hydrological reality, Hydrol, Process., 16, 293
  3. Baveye, 2004, Emergence of a new kind of relativism in environmental modelling: a commentary, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A460, 2141, 10.1098/rspa.2003.1256 · DOI
  4. Beck, 1987, Water quality modelling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty, Water Resources Research, 23, 1393, 10.1029/WR023i008p01393 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beck, M B and Halfon, E, Uncertainty, identifiability and the propagation of prediction errors: a case study of Lake Ontario, J. Forecasting, 10, 135-162, 1991. · doi:10.1002/for.3980100109
  6. Beven, 1993, Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling, Adv, Water Resourc., 16, 41, 10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E · DOI · Paper page
  7. Beven, K.J., Equifinality and Uncertainty in Geomorphological Modelling, in B L Rhoads and C E Thorn (Eds.), The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology, Wiley: Chichester, 289-313, 1996.
  8. Beven, 2000, Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4, 203, 10.5194/hess-4-203-2000 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Beven, K.J. Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer, Wiley, Chichester, 2001a.
  10. Beven, K.J., 2001b. How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5(1), 1–12. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Beven, 2001, On hypothesis testing in hydrology, Hydrological Processes (HPToday), 15, 1655, 10.1002/hyp.436 · doi:10.1002/hyp.436
  12. Beven, K.J., 2002a. Towards a coherent philosophy for environmental modelling, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A460, 458, 2465–2484. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Beven, 2002, Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically-based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system, Hydrol. Process., 186
  14. Beven, 2004, Response to “Emergence of a new kind of relativism in environmental modelling: a commentary”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A460, 2147, 10.1098/rspa.2003.1257 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2003.1257
  15. Beven, 2004, Does an interagency meeting in Washington imply uncertainty?, Hydrological Processes, 18, 1747, 10.1002/hyp.5573 · DOI
  16. Beven, K.J., On the concept of model structural error, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Uncertainty and Precaution in Environmental Modelling, Denmark, 2004c.
  17. Beven, K.J. and Binley, A.M., 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrological Processes, 6, 279–298. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Beven, K.J. and Freer, J., 2001b. A Dynamic TOPMODEL, Hydrol. Process.,15(10), 1993–2011. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Beven, K.J., and Freer, J. 2001. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems, J. Hydrology, 249, 11–29. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Binley, A and Beven, K J, Vadose zone model uncertainty as conditioned on geophysical data, Ground Water, 41(2), 119-127, 2003. · DOI
  21. Blazkova, 2002, On constraining TOPMODEL hydrograph simulations using partial saturated area information, Hydrol. Process., 16, 441, 10.1002/hyp.331 · doi:10.1002/hyp.331
  22. Blazkova, S and Beven, K J, Flood Frequency Estimation by Continuous Simulation for a Catchment treated as Ungauged (with Uncertainty), Water Resources Research, 38(8), doi: 10.1029/2001/WR000500, 2002. · doi:10.1029/2001/wr000500
  23. Box, G E P and Cox, D R, An analysis of transformations (with discussion), J. Roy. Stat. Soc., B26, 211-252, 1964. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Brazier, 2000, Equifinality and uncertainty in physically-based soil erosion models: application of the GLUE methodology to WEPP, the Water Erosion Prediction Project - for sites in the UK and USA, Earth Surf, Process. Landf., 25, 825, 10.1002/1096-9837(200008)25:8<825::AID-ESP101>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Cameron, 2000, Flood frequency estimation under climate change (with uncertainty), Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4, 393, 10.5194/hess-4-393-2000 · DOI
  26. Cappé, 2004, Population Monte Carlo, J. Comp. Graph. Stats., 13, 907, 10.1198/106186004X12803 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Christiaens K, Feyen J, Constraining soil hydraulic parameter and output uncertainty of the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model using the GLUE framework, Hydrol. Process., 16 (2): 373-391, 2002. · doi:10.1002/hyp.335
  28. Clarke, R T, Statistical Modelling in Hydrology, Wiley: Chichester, 1994.
  29. Cushman, 1986, On measurement, scale and scaling, Water Resources Research, 22, 129, 10.1029/WR022i002p00129 · DOI
  30. Draper, 1995, Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty, J. Roy. Stat. Soc., B37, 45, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02015.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Duan, 1992, Effective and efficient global optimisation for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water. Resour. Res., 28, 1015, 10.1029/91WR02985 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Feyen, 2001, Stochastic capture zones delineated within the Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation methodology: conditioning on head observations, Water Resourc. Res., 37, 625, 10.1029/2000WR900351 · DOI
  33. Freer, 1996, Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach, Water Resources Research, 32, 2161, 10.1029/95WR03723 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Freer, J.E., Beven, N.E. Peters. Multivariate seasonal period model rejection within the generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation procedure. in Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by Q. Duan, H. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, A.N. Rousseau, and R. Turcotte, AGU Books, Washington, 69–87, 2002. · DOI
  35. Gardner, R H and O'Neill, R V, Parameter uncertainty and model predictions: a review of Monte Carlo results. In M B Beck and G van Straten (Eds.) Uncertainty and Forecasting of Water Quality, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 245-257, 1983. · DOI
  36. Gupta, 1998, Towards improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and incommensurable measures of information, Water Resourc. Res., 34, 751
  37. Hahn, G J and Meeker, W Q, Statistical Intervals, Wiley: New York, 1991. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Hall, J W, Handling uncertainty in the hydroinformatic process, J. Hydroinformatics, 5.4, 215-232, 2003. · DOI
  39. Ibbitt, R P and O'Donnell, T, Fitting methods for conceptual catchment models, J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE, 97, 1331-1342, 1971. · DOI
  40. Iorgulescu, I, Beven, K J and Musy, A, Data-based modelling of runoff and chemical tracer concentrations in the Haute-Mentue (Switzerland) Research Catchment, Hydrol. Process., 2005, in press. · DOI
  41. Kavetski, D, Franks, S W and Kuczera, G, Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modelling, in Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by Q. Duan, H. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, A.N. Rousseau, and R. Turcotte, AGU Books, Washington, 49-68, 2002. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kirchner, 2001, Catchment-Scale Advection and Dispersion as a Mechanism for Fractal Scaling in Stream Tracer Concentrations, Journal of Hydrology, 254, 82, 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00487-5 · DOI
  43. Klir, G and Folger, T, Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
  44. Konikow, L F and Bredehoeft, J D, Groundwater models cannot be validated?, Adv. Water Resourc., 15, 75-83, 1992. · doi:10.1016/0309-1708(92)90033-x
  45. Krzysztofowicz, 2002, Bayesian system for probabilistic river stage forecasting, J. Hydrology, 268, 16, 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00106-3 · DOI
  46. Kuczera, G and Parent, E, Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm, J. Hydrology, 211, 69-85, 1998. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Lamb, 1998, Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall-runoff model, Advances in Water Resources, 22, 305, 10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00020-7 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Martínez-Vilalta, 2002, Piñol, J and Beven, K J, A hydraulic model to predict drought-induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean, Ecological Modelling, 155, 127
  49. Mwakalila, 2001, Application of a data-based mechanistic modelling (DBM) approach for predicting runoff generation in semi-arid regions, Hydrological Processes, 15, 2281
  50. Oreskes, 1994, Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth scicens, Science, 263, 641
  51. Page, 2003, Investigating the uncertainty in predicting responses to atmospheric deposition using the Model of Acidification of Groundwater in Catchments (MAGIC) within a Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) framework, Water, Air, Soil Pollution, 142, 71
  52. Parkin, 1996, Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 2. Case study for a Mediterranean catchment, J. Hydrol, 175, 595
  53. Press, F, 1968, Earth models obtained by Monte Carlo inversion, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 5323–5234. · doi:10.1029/jb073i016p05223
  54. Romanowicz, R., K.J. Beven and J. Tawn, Evaluation of predictive uncertainty in non-linear hydrological models using a Bayesian approach, in V. Barnett and K.F. Turkman (Eds.) Statistics for the Environment II. Water Related Issues, Wiley, 297-317, 1994.
  55. Romanowicz, R., K.J. Beven and J. Tawn, Bayesian calibration of flood inundation models, in M.G. Anderson, D.E.Walling and P.D. Bates, (Eds.) Floodplain Processes, 333-360, 1996.
  56. Romanowicz, R and Beven, K J, Dynamic real-time prediction of flood inundation probabilities, Hydrol. Sci. J., 43(2), 181-196, 1998. · DOI
  57. Ross, T J, Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1995.
  58. Schulz, 1999, Equifinality and the problem of robust calibration in nitrogen budget simulations, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 63, 1934
  59. Schulz, 2003, Towards simplified robust model structures in land surface - atmosphere flux predictions, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2259, 10.1002/hyp.1331 · doi:10.1002/hyp.1331
  60. Spear, R.C., Grieb, T.M., and Shang, N., 1994, Parameter uncertainity and interaction in complex environmental models, Water Resour. Res., 30, 3159–3170. · DOI
  61. Stephenson, G R and Freeze, R A, Mathematical simulation of subsurface flow contributions to snowmelt runoff, Reynolds Creek, Idaho, Water Resources Research, 10(2), 284-298, 1974. · DOI
  62. Thiemann, 2001, Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models, Water Resourc. Res., 37, 2521
  63. Van Straten, G and Keesman, K J, Uncertainty propagation and speculation in projective forecasts of environmental change, J. Forecasting, 10, 163-190, 1991. · DOI
  64. Vazquez, R, Assessment of the performance of physically based distributed codes simulating medium size hydrological systems, PhD Thesis, Katolieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (ISBN 90-5682-416-3), 335pp, 2003.
  65. Vrugt JA, Bouten W, Gupta, H V and Sorooshian S, Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters: the information content of experimental data, water Resour. Res., 38(12), doi:10.1029/2001001118. · doi:10.1029/2001001118
  66. Vrugt, J A, Gupta, H V, Bouten, W and Sorooshian, S, 2003, A shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), doi:10.1029/2002WR001642. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Whitehead, P G and Young, P C, Water quality in river systems: Monte-Carlo analysis, Water Resources Research, 15, 451-459, 1979. · doi:10.1029/wr015i002p00451
  68. Yapo, 1998, Multi-objective global optimisation for hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 204, 83
  69. Young, P C, The validity and credibility of models for badly-defined systems. In M B Beck and G van Straten (Eds.) Uncertainty and Forecasting of Water Quality, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 69-98, 1983. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82054-0_2
  70. Young, P C. Recursive estimation, forecasting and adaptive control. In C.T. Leondes (Ed.), Control and Dynamic Systems: Advances in Theory and Applications, Vol. 30, Academic Press: San Diego, 119-166, 1990.
  71. Young, 1998, Data-based mechanistic modelling of environmental, ecological, economic and engineering systems, Environmental Modelling and Software, 13, 105
  72. Young, P C. Data-based mechanistic modelling and validation of rainfall-flow processes, in Anderson, M G and Bates, P D (Eds), Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science, Wiley, Chichester, 117-161, 2001.
  73. Young, 2002, Advances in Real Time Forecasting, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., A360, 1430
  74. Young, P C., Top-down and data-based mechanistic modelling of rainfall-flow dynamics at the catchment scale, Hydrological Processes, 17, 2195-2217, 2003.. · doi:10.1002/hyp.1328
  75. Young, P C, Chotai, A and Beven, K J, 2004, Data-Based Mechanistic Modelling and the Simplification of Environmental Systems, in J. Wainwright and M. Mulligan (Eds.), Environmental Modelling: Finding Simplicity in Complexity, Wiley, Chichester, 371-388..
  76. Young, P C and Parkinson, S, Simplicity out of complexity, in M B Beck (Ed.), Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, 251-301, 2002. · doi:10.1016/s0167-8892(02)80014-8
  77. Ye, M., Neuman, S.P., and Meyer, P.D., 2004, Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of spatial variability models in unsaturated fractured tuff, Water Resour. Res., 40, W05113, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002557. · DOI · Paper page
  78. Zak, S and Beven, K J, Equifinality, sensitivity and uncertainty in the estimation of critical loads, Science of the Total Environment, 236, 191-214, 1999. · DOI

Cited by

See all 2,581

Metadata

Authors
Beven, K.
Venue
Journal of Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
320
Issue
1-2
Pages
18-36
ISSN
0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
OpenAlex
W2081346522
Cited by
2,581
References
2
FWCI
82.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
The paper
Beven, K. (2006). A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.