The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe
Piani, C., Haerter, J. O., & Coppola, E. (2010) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-009-0134-9 · Cited by 1,154
Piani, C., Weedon, G. P., Best, M., Gomes, S. M., Viterbo, P., Hagemann, S., & Haerter, J. O. (2010) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.024 · Cited by 868
Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England
Kay, A. L., Davies, H. N., Bell, V. A., & Jones, R. G. (2009) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9471-4 · Cited by 573
Kwadijk, J. C. J., Haasnoot, M., Mulder, J. P. M., Hoogvliet, M. M. C., Jeuken, A. B. M., van der Krogt, R. A. A., van Oostrom, N. G. C., Schelfhout, H. A., van Velzen, E. H., van Waveren, H., et al. (2010) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.64 · Cited by 438
Teutschbein, C., & Seibert, J. (2010) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00357.x · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Leander, R., & Buishand, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 487-496
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105993164
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.006
- The paper
- Leander, R., & Buishand, T. A. (2007). Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
