Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Global hydrological cycles and world water resources
Oki, T., & Kanae, S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128845 · Cited by 4,392 · see citing works
The Changing Character of Precipitation
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M., & Parsons, D. B. (2003) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-84-9-1205 · Cited by 3,196 · see citing works
Unexpected rise in extreme precipitation caused by a shift in rain type?
Haerter, J. O., & Berg, P. (2009) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo523 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gudmundsson, L., Bremnes, J. B., Haugen, J. E., & Engen-Skaugen, T. (2012) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012 · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
A trend-preserving bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach
Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J., & Piontek, F. (2013) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-4-219-2013 · Cited by 1,238 · see citing works
“method extends the approach by Piani et al.(2010) to conserve the trend. An additive approach preserving the absolute changes (for temperature) and a multiplicative one preserving the relative changes (for precipitation) were developed and described in detail. Quantile mapping was applied only to residual or normalise…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialATTRICI v1.1 – counterfactual climate for impact attribution
Mengel, M., Treu, S., Lange, S., & Frieler, K. (2021) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-14-5269-2021 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Catchment response to climate change under CMIP6 scenarios: a case study of the Krishna River Basin
Anil, S., P, A. R., & Vema, V. K. (2024) · Journal of Water and Climate Change · doi:10.2166/wcc.2024.442 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Piani, C., Weedon, G. P., Best, M., Gomes, S. M., Viterbo, P., Hagemann, S., & Haerter, J. O.
- Affiliations
- The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
- Met Office (GB)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Piani, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 199-215
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023796502
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 21.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hydrology (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- statistical bias correction, global climate simulation, daily precipitation, histogram equalization, ECHAM5, climate downscaling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
