The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The hydrological performance of a green roof test bed under UK climatic conditions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A green roof model for building energy simulation programs
Sailor, D. J. (2008) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.02.001 · Cited by 729
Cited by
Assessing the Scale Dynamics of the Rainfall Retention of Green Roofs in a Subtropical Climate
Persch, C. G., Tassi, R., Minetto, B., Allasia, D. G., & Rippel, E. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001933 · Cited by 16
The use of treatment train for stormwater quality control in urban areas in Malaysia: A short review
Osman, M., Takaijudin, H., Yusof, K. W., Goh, H. W., & Ghani, A. A. (2020) · IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/476/1/012090 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Stovin, V., Vesuviano, G., & Kasmin, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 414-415
- Pages
- 148-161
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029616297
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The hydrological performance of a green roof test bed under UK climatic conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.022
- The paper
- Stovin, V., Vesuviano, G., & Kasmin, H. (2012). The hydrological performance of a green roof test bed under UK climatic conditions. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
