Cited by 16Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsUrban Heat Island MitigationUrban Agriculture and Sustainability

Assessing the Scale Dynamics of the Rainfall Retention of Green Roofs in a Subtropical Climate

Persch, Cristiano Gabriel, Tassi, Rutineia, Minetto, Bruna, Allasia, Daniel G., Rippel, Elzon·2021·Journal of Environmental Engineering

Abstract

Various studies have provided insights about how green roof rainfall retention capacity is affected by factors including typology, vegetation, growing media’s physical-chemical-biological properties, drainage system, climate conditions, and roof age. Despite its importance, little has been studied about the effect of drainage area on green roof retention capacity. In this work, three experimental extensive green roof units with different drainage areas (1 m2, 3 m2, and 12 m2) were assessed to evaluate how the rainfall characteristics and the scale dynamics of the green roofs impact the retention during rainfall events. The findings showed that the drainage area had a significant impact on rainfall retention and outflow volumes. The average retention capacity increased, and the outflow generation capacity decreased with increasing drainage area. The largest green roof area (12 m2) presented better performance with respect to rainfall retention, being 36% higher than the 1 m2 area, and 13% higher than the 3 m2 green roof area. In turn, the performance of the 3 m2 green roof was 21% higher than the 1 m2 area. Factors such as rainfall depth and maximum 1-h rainfall intensity also affected the retention and outflow behavior. However, the antecedent dry weather period had little effect on retention and outflow, possibly due to frequent rainfall caused by subtropical climate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001933

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drawing on examples from the Global North often has limited relevance because of socioenvironmental differences, thus cross-comparative research on the effectiveness of types of NbS across climate zones within countries is a critical need.

    “Drawing on examples from the Global North often has limited relevance because of socioenvironmental differences, thus cross-comparative research on the effectiveness of types of NbS across climate zones within countries is a critical need (85).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Persch, C. G., Tassi, R., Minetto, B., Allasia, D. G., & Rippel, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
  • Professor, Dept. of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal Univ. of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil. ORCID:
Corresponding author
Persch, Cristiano Gabriel
Venue
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Published
2021-11
Volume
147
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 0733-9372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7870
OpenAlex
W3199300985
Cited by
16
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Keywords
green roofs, rainfall retention, drainage area, scale effects, extensive green roofs, runoff generation, rainfall characteristics, rainfall intensity, subtropical climate, urban stormwater management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review