Cited by 1,833Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesSoil Moisture and Remote SensingEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management

A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model

Open access
Abbaspour, K.C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., Kløve, B.·2015·Journal of Hydrology

Abstract

A combination of driving forces are increasing pressure on local, national, and regional water supplies needed for irrigation, energy production, industrial uses, domestic purposes, and the environment. In many parts of Europe groundwater quantity, and in particular quality, have come under sever degradation and water levels have decreased resulting in negative environmental impacts. Rapid improvements in the economy of the eastern European block of countries and uncertainties with regard to freshwater availability create challenges for water managers. At the same time, climate change adds a new level of uncertainty with regard to freshwater supplies. In this research we build and calibrate an integrated hydrological model of Europe using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) program. Different components of water resources are simulated and crop yield and water quality are considered at the Hydrological Response Unit (HRU) level. The water resources are quantified at subbasin level with monthly time intervals. Leaching of nitrate into groundwater is also simulated at a finer spatial level (HRU). The use of large-scale, high-resolution water resources models enables consistent and comprehensive examination of integrated system behavior through physically-based, data-driven simulation. In this article we discuss issues with data availability, calibration of large-scale distributed models, and outline procedures for model calibration and uncertainty analysis. The calibrated…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., & Kløve, B.
Affiliations
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Abbaspour, K.C.
Venue
Journal of Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
524
Pages
733-752
ISSN
0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090915513
Cited by
1,833
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 184 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 227 · 2023: 218 · 2022: 205 · 2021: 206 · 2020: 185 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 136 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 4
FWCI
54.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hydrology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Keywords
SWAT model, large-scale hydrological modelling, water quality, nitrate leaching, groundwater quality, model calibration, uncertainty analysis, Water Framework Directive, climate change impacts on water resources, crop yield, data availability, distributed hydrological model, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review