Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States – An overview

Acharya, Bharat Sharma, Kharel, Gehendra·2020·Journal of Hydrology

Abstract

Abstract Water discharged from active, abandoned and/or reclaimed coal mine sites with relatively higher acidity continues to be a global concern due to variable impacts on the quality of surface water and groundwater. Treatment of such acid mine drainage (AMD) is often complex, costly, and challenging. Towards this end, this review provides an overview of the formation and effects of AMD, reviews prediction and treatment methods, identifies critical research gaps, and explores the associated challenges and opportunities AMD poses for environmental scientists and researchers. Acid drainage occurs through oxidation of sulfide minerals such as pyrite. The main sources of AMD include runoff and seepage from mine rock dumps, open pit mines, stockpiles, tailings, construction rocks, and rock cuts. While different active and passive treatment systems are available to treat AMD, prevention techniques and integrated management approaches could better identify possible risks, abate treatment costs, and reduce eco-hydrological hazards. Also, the coal mining sector could benefit from remote and ground sensing techniques, including the use of unmanned aerial vehicles and hyperspectral imaging for hydrogeochemical investigations. Effective treatment of acid drainage from mine areas reduces material damage, allows resource reuse and recovery, and enables successful post-mine land use. Environmental scientists must, however, design and implement a proper framework to address AMD in a timely manner. While mining and treatment plans may vary with land-use history, climate, topography, hydrogeology, available technology, and socio-political outlooks, environmental scientists, regulatory agencies, and mining companies must make it a priority to form multidisciplinary partnerships, advocate for effective enforcement of discharge standards, encourage performance bonding, and formulate remediation plans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125061

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Acharya, B. S., & Kharel, G.
Venue
Journal of Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
588
Pages
125061
ISSN
0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025654489
Cited by
323
References
56
FWCI
11.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States – An overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125061
The paper
Acharya, B. S., & Kharel, G. (2020). Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States – An overview. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.