The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States – An overview
Abstract
Abstract Water discharged from active, abandoned and/or reclaimed coal mine sites with relatively higher acidity continues to be a global concern due to variable impacts on the quality of surface water and groundwater. Treatment of such acid mine drainage (AMD) is often complex, costly, and challenging. Towards this end, this review provides an overview of the formation and effects of AMD, reviews prediction and treatment methods, identifies critical research gaps, and explores the associated challenges and opportunities AMD poses for environmental scientists and researchers. Acid drainage occurs through oxidation of sulfide minerals such as pyrite. The main sources of AMD include runoff and seepage from mine rock dumps, open pit mines, stockpiles, tailings, construction rocks, and rock cuts. While different active and passive treatment systems are available to treat AMD, prevention techniques and integrated management approaches could better identify possible risks, abate treatment costs, and reduce eco-hydrological hazards. Also, the coal mining sector could benefit from remote and ground sensing techniques, including the use of unmanned aerial vehicles and hyperspectral imaging for hydrogeochemical investigations. Effective treatment of acid drainage from mine areas reduces material damage, allows resource reuse and recovery, and enables successful post-mine land use. Environmental scientists must, however, design and implement a proper framework to address AMD in a timely manner. While mining and treatment plans may vary with land-use history, climate, topography, hydrogeology, available technology, and socio-political outlooks, environmental scientists, regulatory agencies, and mining companies must make it a priority to form multidisciplinary partnerships, advocate for effective enforcement of discharge standards, encourage performance bonding, and formulate remediation plans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review
Johnson, D. B., & Hallberg, K. B. (2005) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002 · Cited by 2,179
Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies
Akcil, A., & Koldas, S. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006 · Cited by 1,699
Acid mine drainage: Prevention, treatment options, and resource recovery: A review
Kefeni, K. K., Msagati, T. A. M., & Mamba, B. B. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.082 · Cited by 825
A review of recent strategies for acid mine drainage prevention and mine tailings recycling
Park, I., Tabelin, C. B., Jeon, S., Li, X., Seno, K., Ito, M., & Hiroyoshi, N. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.053 · Cited by 713
Acid mine drainage: Challenges and opportunities
Simate, G. S., & Ndlovu, S. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2014.07.021 · Cited by 689
The Geochemistry of Acid Mine Drainage
Blowes, D. W., Ptacek, C. J., Jambor, J. L., Weisener, C. G., Paktunc, D., Gould, W. D., & Johnson, D. B. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00905-0 · Cited by 587
Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: A review
Feng, Y., Wang, J., Bai, Z., & Reading, L. (2019) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.015 · Cited by 501
A critical review on remediation, reuse, and resource recovery from acid mine drainage
Naidu, G., Ryu, S., Thiruvenkatachari, R., Choi, Y., Jeong, S., & Vigneswaran, S. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.085 · Cited by 479
Environmental Impact of Coal Mining on Water Regime and Its Management
Tiwary, R. K. (2001) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1023/a:1012083519667 · Cited by 407
The Geochemistry of Acid Mine Drainage
Blowes, D. W., Ptacek, C. J., Jambor, J. L., & Weisener, C. G. (2003) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/09137-4 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Novel Adsorbent Based on Banana Peel Waste for Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Synthetic Solutions
Negroiu, M., Țurcanu, A. A., Matei, E., Râpă, M., Covaliu, C. I., Predescu, A. M., Pantilimon, C. M., Coman, G., & Predescu, C. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14143946 · Cited by 55
Awad, J., Navarro, D., Kirby, J., Walker, C., & Juhasz, A. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2024.2360762 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Acharya, B. S., & Kharel, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 588
- Pages
- 125061
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025654489
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States – An overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125061
- The paper
- Acharya, B. S., & Kharel, G. (2020). Acid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States – An overview. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.