The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of recent strategies for acid mine drainage prevention and mine tailings recycling
Abstract
Acid mine/rock drainage (AMD/ARD), effluents with low pH and high concentrations of hazardous and toxic elements generated when sulfide-rich wastes are exposed to the environment, is considered as a serious environmental problem encountered by the mining and mineral processing industries around the world. Remediation options like neutralization, adsorption, ion exchange, membrane technology, biological mediation, and electrochemical approach have been developed to reduce the negative environmental impacts of AMD on ecological systems and human health. However, these techniques require the continuous supply of chemicals and energy, expensive maintenance and labor cost, and long-term monitoring of affected ecosystems until AMD generation stops. Unfortunately, the formation of AMD could persist for hundreds or even thousands of years, so these approaches are both costly and unsustainable. Recently, two alternative strategies for the management of AMD and mine tailings are gaining much attention: (1) prevention techniques, and (2) mine waste recycling. In this review, recent advances in AMD prevention techniques like oxygen barriers, utilization of bactericides, co-disposal and blending, and passivation of sulfide minerals are discussed. In addition, recycling of mine tailings as construction and geopolymer materials to reduce the amounts of wastes for disposal are introduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Life in acid: pH homeostasis in acidophiles
Baker-Austin, C., & Dopson, M. (2007) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.005 · Cited by 659
Cited by
Tabelin, C. B., Dallas, J., Casanova, S., Pelech, T., Bournival, G., Saydam, S., & Canbulat, I. (2021) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106743 · Cited by 533
Self-citationAcid mine drainage from coal mining in the United States – An overview
Acharya, B. S., & Kharel, G. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125061 · Cited by 323
Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation
Azadi, M., Northey, S. A., Ali, S. H., & Edraki, M. (2020) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-020-0531-3 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, I., Tabelin, C. B., Jeon, S., Li, X., Seno, K., Ito, M., & Hiroyoshi, N.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 219
- Pages
- 588-606
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903139441
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of recent strategies for acid mine drainage prevention and mine tailings recycling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.053
- The paper
- Park, I., Tabelin, C. B., Jeon, S., Li, X., Seno, K., Ito, M., & Hiroyoshi, N. (2019). A review of recent strategies for acid mine drainage prevention and mine tailings recycling. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.