The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A deep convolutional neural network model for rapid prediction of fluvial flood inundation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Most of the two-dimensional (2D) hydraulic/hydrodynamic models are still computationally too demanding for real-time applications. In this paper, an innovative modelling approach based on a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) method is presented for rapid prediction of fluvial flood inundation. The CNN model is trained using outputs from a 2D hydraulic model (i.e. LISFLOOD-FP) to predict water depths. The pre-trained model is then applied to simulate the January 2005 and December 2015 floods in Carlisle, UK. The CNN predictions are compared favourably with the outputs produced by LISFLOOD-FP. The performance of the CNN model is further confirmed by benchmarking against a support vector regression (SVR) method. The results show that the CNN model outperforms SVR by a large margin. The CNN model is highly accurate in capturing flooded cells as indicated by several quantitative assessment matrices. The estimated error for reproducing maximum flood depth is 0–0.2 m for the 2005 event and 0–0.5 m for the 2015 event at over 99% of the cells covering the computational domain. The proposed CNN method offers great potential for real-time flood modelling/forecasting considering its simplicity, superior performance and computational efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 14,214
1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey
Kiranyaz, S., Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Ince, T., Gabbouj, M., & Inman, D. J. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398 · Cited by 2,835
A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation
Bates, P. D., & De Roo, A. P. J. (2000) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00278-x · Cited by 1,460
Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., & Fewtrell, T. J. (2010) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027 · Cited by 1,273
About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies
Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B. M., & Rossiter, D. G. (2007) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001 · Cited by 1,019
A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model
Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H., & Oki, T. (2011) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2010wr009726 · Cited by 932
Cited by
Qi, X., de Almeida, G. A. M., & Maldonado, S. (2024) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131263 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Kabir, S., Patidar, S., Xia, X., Liang, Q., Neal, J., & Pender, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 590
- Pages
- 125481
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3083014107
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A deep convolutional neural network model for rapid prediction of fluvial flood inundation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125481
- The paper
- Kabir, S., Patidar, S., Xia, X., Liang, Q., Neal, J., & Pender, G. (2020). A deep convolutional neural network model for rapid prediction of fluvial flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.