The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
XGBoost-based method for flash flood risk assessment
Abstract
Abstract Flash flood risk assessment, a widely applied technology in preventing catastrophic flash flood disasters, has become the current research hotspot. However, most existing machine learning methods for assessing flash flood risk rely on a single classifier, which is suitable for processing small sets of sample data, but the resulting prediction accuracy and generalization ability are insufficient. Meanwhile, machine learning methods that integrate multiple classifiers are thus far unknown. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) is an excellent algorithm for ensemble learning methods which has achieved remarkable results in many fields. It not only optimizes the algorithm but also automatically applies the CPU's multi-threading to perform parallel calculations, thus greatly improving the model training speed and prediction accuracy. Therefore, this article introduces the XGBoost model for the assessment of flash flood risk, and then combines the two input strategies and the Least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) model to verify its optimal effect, thus proposing the XGBoost-based method for flash flood risk assessment. Subsequently, an attribution analysis was implemented to assess the possible errors of this approach; and finally, a county-level flash flood risk map for Yunnan Province, China, was generated based on the proposed method. The results demonstrate that: (1) XGBoost performs well, with an accuracy of 0.84 in the testing period, and its five indices (precision, recall, accuracy, kappa, and F-score) are all higher than those of LSSVM. (2) The XGBoost-based approach provided the reliable flash flood risk maps, which were validated by another flash flood inventory, although some errors may be attributed to critical environmental factors and statistical disaster location accuracy. (3) The high-risk counties (including high-risk and highest-risk) accounted for 40.3%, with the highest-risk counties mainly concentrated in southeastern Yunnan. This article further addresses the limitations of XGBoost (e.g., as a time-consuming greedy algorithm, the non-necessity of multi-threaded optimization). All of the above results indicate that the XGBoost-based method is an effective method for obtaining high-quality county-level flash flood risk maps, which contributes to the theoretical basis for ongoing county-level flash flood prevention in China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569
Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods
Blöschl, G., Hall, J., Viglione, A., Perdigão, R. A. P., Parajka, J., Merz, B., Lun, D., Arheimer, B., Aronica, G. T., Bilibashi, A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1495-6 · Cited by 1,318
Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic
Monserud, R. A., & Leemans, R. (1992) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-w · Cited by 1,106
Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest
Wang, Z., Lai, C., Chen, X., Yang, B., Zhao, S., & Bai, X. (2015) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.008 · Cited by 822
Self-citationKhosravi, K., Pham, B. T., Chapi, K., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Revhaug, I., Prakash, I., & Tien Bui, D. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266 · Cited by 792
Benchmarking Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers
van Gestel, T., Suykens, J. A. K., Baesens, B., Viaene, S., Vanthienen, J., Dedene, G., de Moor, B., & Vandewalle, J. (2004) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/b:mach.0000008082.80494.e0 · Cited by 745
Khosravi, K., Shahabi, H., Pham, B. T., Adamowski, J., Shirzadi, A., Pradhan, B., Dou, J., Ly, H.-B., Gróf, G., Ho, H. L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073 · Cited by 744
Support vector regression for real-time flood stage forecasting
Yu, P.-S., Chen, S.-T., & Chang, I.-F. (2006) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.01.021 · Cited by 568
Machine learning–XGBoost analysis of language networks to classify patients with epilepsy
Torlay, L., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Thomas, E., & Baciu, M. (2017) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1007/s40708-017-0065-7 · Cited by 483
Mojaddadi, H., Pradhan, B., Nampak, H., Ahmad, N., & Ghazali, A. H. B. (2017) · Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk · doi:10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Akasheh, M. A., Malik, E. F., Hujran, O., & Zaki, N. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121794 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, M., Zhao, G., He, B., Li, Q., Dong, H., Wang, S., & Wang, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 598
- Pages
- 126382
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159897038
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 24.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: XGBoost-based method for flash flood risk assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126382
- The paper
- Ma, M., Zhao, G., He, B., Li, Q., Dong, H., Wang, S., & Wang, Z. (2021). XGBoost-based method for flash flood risk assessment. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.