The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, an ensemble method, which demonstrated efficiency in GIS based flood modeling, was used to create flood probability indices for the Damansara River catchment in Malaysia. To estimate flood probability, the frequency ratio (FR) approach was combined with support vector machine (SVM) using a radial basis function kernel. Thirteen flood conditioning parameters, namely, altitude, aspect, slope, curvature, stream power index, topographic wetness index, sediment transport index, topographic roughness index, distance from river, geology, soil, surface runoff, and land use/cover (LULC), were selected. Each class of conditioning factor was weighted using the FR approach and entered as input for SVM modeling to optimize all the parameters. The flood hazard map was produced by combining the flood probability map with flood-triggering factors such as; averaged daily rainfall and flood inundation depth. Subsequently, the hydraulic 2D high-resolution sub-grid model (HRS) was applied to estimate the flood inundation depth. Furthermore, vulnerability weights were assigned to each element at risk based on their importance. Finally flood risk map was generated. The results of this research demonstrated that the proposed approach would be effective for flood risk management in the study area along the expressway and could be easily replicated in other areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tehrany, M. S., Jones, S., & Shabani, F. (2019) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011 · Cited by 396
Sameen, M. I., Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2020) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104249 · Cited by 363
Self-citationApplications of machine learning methods for engineering risk assessment – A review
Hegde, J., & Rokseth, B. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.015 · Cited by 363
Flood susceptibility mapping using convolutional neural network frameworks
Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Hong, H., & Peng, L. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124482 · Cited by 339
Das, S. (2018) · Arabian Journal of Geosciences · doi:10.1007/s12517-018-3933-4 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Mojaddadi, H., Pradhan, B., Nampak, H., Ahmad, N., & Ghazali, A. H. B.
- Venue
- Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-03-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1080-1102
- ISSN
- 1947-5705 (ISSN-L)
- 1947-5713
- OpenAlex
- W2594352094
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113
- The paper
- Mojaddadi, H., Pradhan, B., Nampak, H., Ahmad, N., & Ghazali, A. H. B. (2017). Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.