Cited by 130Polymer-Based Agricultural EnhancementsMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsNanoparticles: synthesis and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mof-enabled pesticides as developing approach for sustainable agriculture and reducing environmental hazards

Open access
Karimi-Maleh, Hassan, Ghalkhani, Masoumeh, Saberi Dehkordi, Zeinab, Mohsenpour Tehran, Melika, Singh, Jagpreet, Wen, Yangping, Baghayeri, Mehdi, Rouhi, Jalal, Fu, Li, Rajendran, Saravanan·2024·Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

Abstract

In the context of agricultural sustainability and the necessity for food security, using nano pesticides as an innovative technology represents an alternative with good potential to overcome the drawbacks of classical pesticides. This work provides a general overview of the main aspects in the area of nano-pesticides with a focus on Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs). Although in its early infancy, the research performed so far indicated that compared with classical pesticides, MOF-based nano-pesticides show an improved performance, controlled and sustained active ingredient release and targeted delivery. Moreover, the flexibility in design and capability for modification and hybridization indicate MOFs as promising candidates for further improvements. Nevertheless, since the long-term toxic effects of MOF-based nano-pesticides are not yet fully understood, additional studies focusing on the impact of individual components and of the overall nano-system are required to determine if the envisioned potential can be reached.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.08.044

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Wang, 2022, J. Food Meas. Charact., 1
  2. Khosrowshahi, 2022, Food Chem., 386
  3. Shekhar, 2021, Advances, 2, 6569
  4. Kah, 2013, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.
  5. Vasseghian, 2022, J. Clean. Prod., 133966
  6. S. Kadam, V. Patul, S. Waghmode, S. Dagade-Gadale, Use of Nano pesticide in Agriculture and its Toxicity–A Review, (2021).
  7. Anandhi, 2020, J. Entomol. Zool. Stud, 8, 685
  8. Gacem, 2022, Copper Nanostructures: Next-Generation of Agrochemicals for Sustainable Agroecosystems, Elsevier, 203
  9. Liu, 2014, J. Nanopart. Res., 16, 1
  10. Ulrichs, 2006, Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci., 71, 171
  11. Gao, 2021, Cytotoxicity and Insecticidal Properties
  12. Badawy, 2022, Science, 42, 293
  13. Barrera-Méndez, 2021, Journal of Nano Research, Trans Tech Publ, 143
  14. Yin, 2018, Agriculture, 17, 1822
  15. Zhang, 2022, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 209
  16. Abouelkassem, 2016, Appl. Sci., 3, 252
  17. Lopes, 2016, Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., 11, 153
  18. Sun, 2020, Société et Environnement, 24
  19. Elsharkawy, 2020, Journal of Nanomedicine, 3, 1029
  20. Bernal-Chávez, 2022, Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev., 2022
  21. Raj, 2021, J. Mol. Struct., 1239
  22. Guo, 2022, Carbon Letters, 1
  23. Saghiri, 2021, Chemical Methodologies, 5, 234
  24. Committee, 2018, EFSA J., 16
  25. Yang, 2023, Chem. Eng. J., 458
  26. Bervia Lunardi, 2022, Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage., 17
  27. Huang, 2021, Chem. Eng. J., 403
  28. Zhang, 2022, Chem. Eng. J., 431
  29. Wang, 2020, Biomaterials, 230
  30. Saeb, 2021, Nanomaterials, 14, 3652
  31. Ma, 2023, Chem. Eng. J., 462
  32. Chen, 2020, Chapter 7 - Hydrothermal synthesis of MOFs, 141
  33. Vaitsis, 2020, Chapter 11 - Sonochemical synthesis of MOFs, 223
  34. Ma, 2021, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9
  35. Chaud, 2021, Toxics, 9, 10.3390/toxics9060131 · DOI
  36. Lima, 2018, Fundamental and Applied Aspects
  37. Xu, 2020, Chem. Eng. J., 395

Metadata

Authors
Karimi-Maleh, H., Ghalkhani, M., Saberi Dehkordi, Z., Mohsenpour Tehran, M., Singh, J., Wen, Y., Baghayeri, M., Rouhi, J., Fu, L., & Rajendran, S.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (IR)
  • Chandigarh University (IN)
  • Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN)
  • Hakim Sabzevari University (IR)
  • University of Tabriz (IR)
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • University of Tarapacá (CL)
Corresponding author
Ghalkhani, Masoumeh
Venue
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
129
Pages
105-123
ISSN
1226-086X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386258646
Cited by
130
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 39
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (5037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Keywords
metal-organic frameworks, nanopesticides, controlled release, targeted delivery, pesticide toxicity, sustainable agriculture, environmental hazards, food security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review