The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change
Open accessAbstract
Change is crucial for organizations in growing, highly competitive business environments. Theories of change describe the effectiveness with which organizations are able to modify their strategies, processes, and structures. The action research model, the positive model, and Lewin's change model indicate the stages of organizational change. This study examined the three stages of Lewin's model: unfreezing, movement, and refreezing. Although this model establishes general steps, additional information must be considered to adapt these steps to specific situations. This article presents a critical review of change theories for different stages of organizational change. In this critical review, change management offers a constructive framework for managing organizational change throughout different stages of the process. This review has theoretical and practical implications, which are discussed in this article. Immunity to change is also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations
Longshore, J. M., & Bass, B. M. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258081 · Cited by 12,412
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,390
Leadership : Theory and Practice
Northouse, P. G. (2015) · Cited by 6,488
Field Theory in Social Science
French, R. L., Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1953) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418749 · Cited by 5,190
Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
Wenger, É., & Snyder, W. M. (2002) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 4,762
In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best- run companies
(1983) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(83)90015-8 · Cited by 4,437
Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
Cuddy, C. (2002) · The Bottom Line · doi:10.1108/bl.2002.17015bae.001 · Cited by 3,923
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148667 · Cited by 3,904
Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556658 · Cited by 3,592
Cited by
Butt, J. (2020) · Designs · doi:10.3390/designs4030017 · Cited by 247
Untitled work
Davies, W. (2025) · Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice
Metadata
- Authors
- Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 123-127
- ISSN
- 2444-569X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2531595198
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002
- The paper
- Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018). Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.