A Conceptual Framework to Support Digital Transformation in Manufacturing Using an Integrated Business Process Management Approach
Open accessAbstract
Digital transformation is no longer a future trend, as it has become a necessity for businesses to grow and remain competitive in the market. The fourth industrial revolution, called Industry 4.0, is at the heart of this transformation, and is supporting organizations in achieving benefits that were unthinkable a few years ago. The impact of Industry 4.0 enabling technologies in the manufacturing sector is undeniable, and their correct use offers benefits such as improved productivity and asset performance, reduced inefficiencies, lower production and maintenance costs, while enhancing system agility and flexibility. However, organizations have found the move towards digital transformation extremely challenging for several reasons, including a lack of standardized implementation protocols, emphasis on the introduction of new technologies without assessing their role within the business, the compartmentalization of digital initiatives from the rest of the business, and the large-scale implementation of digitalization without a realistic view of return on investment. To instill confidence and reduce the anxiety surrounding Industry 4.0 implementation in the manufacturing sector, this paper presents a conceptual framework based on business process management (BPM). The framework is informed by a content-centric literature review of Industry 4.0 technologies, its design principles, and BPM method. This integrated framework incorporates the factors that are often overlooked during digital transformation and presents a structured methodology that can be employed by manufacturing organizations to facilitate their transition towards Industry 4.0.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The theoretical approaches of those three DTMs are co-innovation and strategic road mapping, lean thinking philosophy, and business process management, respectively.
“which are, respectively, co-innovation and strategic road mapping, the lean thinking philosophy and business process management.”
From Digital Transformation Models for the I4.0 Transition: Lessons from the Change Management Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Butt [58] derives an integrated business-process management framework (IBPM) based on narrative literature review, rooted in BPM tradition and proposed as a method to support manufacturing organizations' journey towards I4.0.
“Butt [58] derives an integrated business-process management framework (IBPM) based on narrative literature review.”
From Digital Transformation Models for the I4.0 Transition: Lessons from the Change Management Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Only three DTMs-Erol et al. [49], Romero et al. [52] and Butt [58]-explicitly mention the theoretical approach used to develop them.
“Only three DTMs-i.e., Erol et al. [49], Romero et al. [52] and Butt [58]-explicitly mention the theoretical approach used to develop them, which are, respectively, co-innovation and strategic road mapping, the lean thinking philosophy and business process management.”
From Digital Transformation Models for the I4.0 Transition: Lessons from the Change Management Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Issa et al. [51] and Butt [58] are the only academic DTMs that envisage creation of an ad-hoc task force to organize and manage digital transformation.
“From an organizational perspective, the DTMs provided by Issa et al. [51] and Butt [58] are the only academic models that envisage the creation of an ad-hoc task force to organize and manage the digital transformation initiative.”
From Digital Transformation Models for the I4.0 Transition: Lessons from the Change Management Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Butt [58] envisages an activity of monitoring change and suggests adopting a lean six-sigma approach.
“Butt [58] also envisages an activity of monitoring change and suggests adopting a lean six-sigma approach.”
From Digital Transformation Models for the I4.0 Transition: Lessons from the Change Management Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 250 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Butt, J.
- Affiliations
- Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Butt, Javaid
- ORCID
- Butt, Javaid
- Venue
- Designs
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-06-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 17
- ISSN
- 2411-9660 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3037949765
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 250
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Designs (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
- Keywords
- digital transformation, manufacturing industry, Industry 4.0, business process management, conceptual framework, digitalization, implementation methodology, return on investment, enabling technologies, organizational agility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review