Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Substantive green innovation or symbolic green innovation? The impact of ER on enterprise green innovation based on the dual moderating effects

Open access
Lian, Ganghui, Xu, Aiting, Zhu, Yuhan·2022·Journal of Innovation & Knowledge

Abstract

Based on the existing research on environmental regulation (ER) and enterprise innovation, this paper separates green innovation ability from general technological innovation and divides it, from the perspective of motivation, into substantive green innovation (SUBGI) and symbolic green innovation (SYMGI). This paper employs panel data of China's A-share listed enterprise from 2008 to 2018 in a difference-in-difference-in-difference model to construct a quasinatural experiment on the impacts of ER and the green innovation strategy of enterprises. Government subsidies and regulatory capture are used to explore the mechanism between ER and innovation behavior. The results show that ER has a significantly positive effect on green innovation, but its impact on SYMGI and SUBGI decreases. Under the constraints of the ER policy, government subsidies incentivize the green innovation of enterprises, but they are not the main reason for the difference between the two innovation behaviors. Regulatory capture plays a negative moderating role in ER promoting enterprises’ SUBGI and has no significant impact on SYMGI, which is the key factor leading to the difference between the two innovation behaviors. The heterogeneity test suggests a pronounced promotion effect of ER on state-owned enterprises, large enterprises, and growing enterprises. This study provides momentous policy implications for making rational use of environmental policies in promoting enterprises’ green innovation capability, especially high-quality green innovation behavior aimed at promoting enterprises’ green technology progress and gaining competitive advantages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100203

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Metadata

Authors
Lian, G., Xu, A., & Zhu, Y.
Venue
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
100203
ISSN
2444-569X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286780516
Cited by
388
References
78
FWCI
59.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substantive green innovation or symbolic green innovation? The impact of ER on enterprise green innovation based on the dual moderating effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100203
The paper
Lian, G., Xu, A., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Substantive green innovation or symbolic green innovation? The impact of ER on enterprise green innovation based on the dual moderating effects. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.