Cited by 22Environmental Sustainability in BusinessEmployee Performance and LeadershipSustainability and Innovation in Business

Green innovation influenced by employee innovative work behavior via moderating role of innovative leaderships

Open access
Al-Ayed, Sura·2024·Cogent Business & Management

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of digital and green innovation within organizational contexts, focusing on the interplay between innovative work behavior, innovative leadership and the adoption of digital technologies. Survey data were collected from employees working in private sector organizations in Saudi Arabia, using a questionnaire encompassing key constructs related to digital and green innovation. Data analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), revealing significant relationships between the variables under investigation. The results indicate that innovative work behavior positively influences digital innovation, while digital innovation in turn facilitates green innovation. Innovative leadership emerges as a critical factor influencing both digital and green innovation, with strong positive associations found between innovative leadership and innovation outcomes. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of fostering a culture of innovation and investing in leadership development to drive both digital and green innovation effectively. The implications of these findings extend to organizations, policymakers and researchers, highlighting the importance of promoting innovation and sustainability initiatives in organizational and societal contexts. This study contributes to the understanding of the drivers of digital and green innovation, offering insights for organizations seeking to enhance their competitiveness and promote environmental sustainability in an increasingly digitalized world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23311975.2024.2393741

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital leadership substantially influences innovative work behavior.

    “Recent research by Ahmed et al. (2024), Al-Ayed (2024), and Zia et al. (2025) indicates that digital leadership substantially influences IWB.”

    From Evoking teachers' innovative work behavior: Perspective of digital leadership, creativity, and proactive personality through work engagement (2025) · cites this paper as Al-Ayed, 2024

    Section 2.3 (page unavailable) says supportive, visionary leadership is expected to encourage employees’ innovative work behavior. It does not identify that leadership as digital leadership or establish a substantial effect of digital leadership on innovative work behavior; its stated hypotheses instead concern innovative leadership’s relationship with digital innovation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alateeg, S., & Alhammadi, A. (2024). The impact of organizational culture on organizational innovation with the mediation role of strategic leadership in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 13(2), 843–858.
  2. Alateeg, S., Alhammadi, A., Al-Ayed, S. I., & Helmi, M. A. (2024). Factors influencing on behavioral intention to adopt artificial intelligence for startup sustainability. Kurdish Studies, 12(1), 2924–2941.
  3. Al-Ayed, S. I. (2024). Drivers of E-business adoption in SMEs in Saudi Arabia. Migration Letters, 21(3), 30–42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Ayed, S.
Affiliations
Arab Open University (SA)
Corresponding author
Al-Ayed, Sura
Venue
Cogent Business & Management
Published
2024-08-28
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2331-1975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402021565
Cited by
22
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 1
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Business & Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arab Open University (AOUKSA-524008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
Keywords
green innovation, digital innovation, innovative behavior, innovation leadership, moderating effect, digital technology adoption, employee behavior, leadership development, innovation culture, environmental sustainability, Saudi Arabia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review