The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management: Moderating role of organizational green culture
Open accessAbstract
The authors have focused on organizational capabilities to achieve sustainable development goals (SDG) in the current study. In this regard, green knowledge management (GKM) and green innovation (specifically green technological and management innovation) are investigated. Moreover, it is also studied whether organizational green culture (OGC) strengthens organizational capabilities to innovate green and achieve sustainability goals via GKM. The researcher collected data from managers of different levels from manufacturing and service enterprises of all sizes and analyzed it through structural equation modeling. GKM strengthens organizational capabilities to achieve green innovation and SDG as per the findings. Moreover, green innovation has also been found to be a significant positive predictor of corporate sustainable development (CSD). It is also found that OGC strengthens the relationship between GKM and green innovation for achieving SDG. Furthermore, for all sizes of manufacturing and service organizations, GKM is found to be equally important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices
HOELTER, J. W. (1983) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124183011003003 · Cited by 1,624
Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423 · Cited by 422
Ahmed, Z., Nathaniel, S. P., & Shahbaz, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125529 · Cited by 302
Habib, M., Abbas, J., & Noman, R. (2019) · International Journal of Social Economics · doi:10.1108/ijse-09-2018-0472 · Cited by 170
Self-citationCOP26 and beyond: long-term climate strategies are key to safeguard health and equity
Wyns, A., & Beagley, J. (2021) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00294-1 · Cited by 27
Cited by
Jiakui, C., Abbas, J., Najam, H., Liu, J., & Abbas, J. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135131 · Cited by 666
Self-citationAbbas, J., Wang, L., Ben Belgacem, S., Pawar, P. S., Najam, H., & Abbas, J. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.126683 · Cited by 347
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., Abbas, J., Sial, M. S., Álvarez-Otero, S., & Cioca, L.-I.
- Venue
- Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 100272
- ISSN
- 2444-569X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4296771022
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 68.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management: Moderating role of organizational green culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100272
- The paper
- Wang, S., Abbas, J., Sial, M. S., Álvarez-Otero, S., & Cioca, L.-I. (2022). Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management: Moderating role of organizational green culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
