Cited by 1,624Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices

HOELTER, JON W.·1983·Sociological Methods & Research

Abstract

A major problem encountered in covariance structure analyses involves decisions concerning whether or not a given theoretical model adequately represents the data used for its assessment. Given that X 2 goodness-of-fit tests are joint functions of the difference between theoretical and empirical covariance structures and sample size, gauging the impact of sample size on such tests is essential. In this paper, we propose a simple index (critical N) and tentative acceptance criterion, which, by focusing on sample size, provide an improved method for assessing goodness-of-fit. Both small- and large-sample examples are presented, illustrating the utility of the proposed method for assessing theoretical models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0049124183011003003

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOELTER, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
HOELTER, JON W.
Venue
Sociological Methods & Research
Published
1983-02
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
325-344
ISSN
  • 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8294
OpenAlex
W2023172395
Cited by
1,624
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 61
FWCI
19.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sociological Methods & Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
structural equation modeling, goodness-of-fit tests, sample size, model fit assessment, chi-square test, small sample inference, acceptance criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review