Cited by 29Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmune cells in cancerT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Phenotypic characterization and functional analysis of human tumor immune infiltration after mechanical and enzymatic disaggregation

Grange, Cécile, Létourneau, Jason, Forget, Marie-Andrée, Godin-Ethier, Jessica, Martin, Jocelyne, Liberman, Moishe, Latour, Mathieu, Widmer, Hugues +4 more·2011·Journal of Immunological Methods

Abstract

Multi-parametric flow cytometry analysis is a reliable method for phenotypic and functional characterization of tumor infiltrating immune cells (TIIC). The isolation of infiltrating leukocytes from solid tumors can be achieved through various methods which can be both enzymatic and mechanical; however, these methods may alter cell biology. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three tissue disaggregation techniques on TIIC biology in breast, kidney and lung tumor specimens. We therefore compared two enzymatic treatments using either collagenase type IA alone or in combination with collagenase type IV and DNase I type II, and one mechanical system (Medimachine™). We evaluated the impact of treatments on cell viability, surface marker integrity and proliferative capacity. We show that cell viability was not significantly altered by treatments. However, enzymatic treatments decreased cell proliferation; specifically collagenases and DNase provoked a significant decrease in detection of surface markers such as CD4, CD8, CD45RA and CD14, indicating that results of phenotypic studies employing these techniques could be affected. In conclusion, mechanical tissue disaggregation by Medimachine™ appears to be optimal to maintain phenotypic and functional TIIC features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jim.2011.07.002

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grange, C., Létourneau, J., Forget, M.-A., Godin-Ethier, J., Martin, J., Liberman, M., Latour, M., Widmer, H., Lattouf, J.-B., Piccirillo, C. A., Cailhier, J.-F., & Lapointe, R.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Notre-Dame (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Lapointe, Réjean
Venue
Journal of Immunological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
372
Issue
1-2
Pages
119-126
ISSN
0022-1759 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010681714
Cited by
29
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Immunological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Université de Montréal
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
tumor-infiltrating immune cells, tissue disaggregation, mechanical tissue dissociation, enzymatic tissue dissociation, type IV collagenase, DNase I, cell viability, surface marker expression, cell proliferation, breast tumors, kidney tumors, lung cancer, tumor immune infiltration
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Cell Separation, Female, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review