Cited by 25Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Quantitative comparison of human intestinal mononuclear leukocyte isolation techniques for flow cytometric analyses

Open access
Schreurs, R.R.C.E., Drewniak, A., Bakx, R., Corpeleijn, W.E., Geijtenbeek, T.H.B., van Goudoever, J.B., Bunders, M.J.·2017·Journal of Immunological Methods

Abstract

Studies on immune cells derived from the human intestine are needed to understand the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal diseases and to develop novel treatment strategies. Isolation techniques to extract these immune cells from intestinal tissue are largely based on murine studies and comparative data on isolation from human intestine is scarce. In this study we evaluated cell yield, viability, and surface-molecule expression on mononuclear leukocytes, comparing three techniques to obtain a single immune cell suspension from human intestine; low concentrations of either the enzymes Collagenase D or Liberase TL, and enzyme-free mechanical dissociation with the Medimachine. Both enzymatic isolation techniques provided a higher cell yield than mechanical dissociation. Expression of surface molecules remained intact after Collagenase D treatment, while Liberase TL digestion resulted in a strong decrease in the expression of the CD4 receptor. Taken together, Collagenase D digestion provides the highest yield of mononuclear cells while keeping surface molecule expression intact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jim.2017.03.006

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schreurs, R. R. C. E., Drewniak, A., Bakx, R., Corpeleijn, W. E., Geijtenbeek, T. H. B., van Goudoever, J. B., & Bunders, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bunders, M.J.
Venue
Journal of Immunological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
445
Pages
45-52
ISSN
0022-1759 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592431882
Cited by
25
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Immunological Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
human intestine, mechanical tissue dissociation, cell yield, cell viability, surface molecule expression, CD4
MeSH terms
Flow Cytometry, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Thermolysin, Collagenases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review