Cited by 158International Business and FDIInternational Development and AidInternational Arbitration and Investment Law

Does foreign aid mitigate the adverse effect of expropriation risk on foreign direct investment?

Open access
Asiedu, Elizabeth, Jin, Yi, Nandwa, Boaz·2009·Journal of International Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.03.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asiedu, E., Jin, Y., & Nandwa, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Jin, Yi
Venue
Journal of International Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
268-275
ISSN
0022-1996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125135438
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of International Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Arbitration and Investment Law
Keywords
foreign aid, expropriation risk, foreign direct investment, underinvestment, aid effectiveness, investment risk, low-income countries, sub-Saharan Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review