Cited by 627International Business and FDINatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentCorruption and Economic Development

Democracy, foreign direct investment and natural resources

Asiedu, Elizabeth, Lien, Donald·2011·Journal of International Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.12.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asiedu, E., & Lien, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Asiedu, Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of International Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
99-111
ISSN
0022-1996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149109368
Cited by
627
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 18
FWCI
54.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of International Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
Keywords
democracy, foreign direct investment, natural resources, resource exports, democratization, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review