The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the first billion acres
Tabashnik, B. E., Brévault, T., & Carrière, Y. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2597 · Cited by 1,086
“Phylogenetic Classification of Cordyceps and the Clavicipitaceous Fungi”
Sung, G.-H., Hywel-Jones, N. L., Sung, J.-M., Luangsa-ard, J. J., Shrestha, B., & Spatafora, J. W. (2007) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim.2007.57.01 · Cited by 1,077
Economic, Ecological, Food Safety, and Social Consequences of the Deployment of Bt Transgenic Plants
Shelton, A. M., Zhao, J.-Z., & Roush, R. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145309 · Cited by 794
Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control
Romeis, J., Meissle, M., & Bigler, F. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1180 · Cited by 719
Bacillus thuringiensis serovariety israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus for mosquito control
Lacey, L. A. (2007) · Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association · doi:10.2987/8756-971x(2007)23[133:btsiab]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 431
Self-citationBt Crop Effects on Functional Guilds of Non-Target Arthropods: A Meta-Analysis
Wolfenbarger, L. L., Naranjo, S. E., Lundgren, J. G., Bitzer, R. J., & Watrud, L. S. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002118 · Cited by 324
Bt cotton and sustainability of pesticide reductions in India
Krishna, V. V., & Qaim, M. (2012) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.11.005 · Cited by 118
Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified?
Ricroch, A., Bergé, J. B., & Kuntz, M. (2010) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-009-9297-5 · Cited by 80 · cited 31×
“1613 They are safe to humans and are generally safe to other nontarget organisms and the environment 1614 (Akhurst and Smith, 2002; Ehlers, 2005), which has led to a lack of pesticide registration 1615 requirements in many countries such as the United States and nations in the European Union 1616 (Ehlers, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialEnvironmental impacts of genetically modified crops
Noack, F., Engist, D., Gantois, J., Gaur, V., Hyjazie, B. F., Larsen, A., M’Gonigle, L. K., Missirian, A., Qaim, M., Sargent, R. D., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado9340 · Cited by 70
Cited by
When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications
Stenberg, J. A., Sundh, I., Becher, P. G., Björkman, C., Dubey, M., Egan, P. A., Friberg, H., Gil, J. F., Jensen, D. F., Jonsson, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-021-01354-7 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacey, L. A., Grzywacz, D., Shapiro-Ilan, D. I., Frutos, R., Brownbridge, M., & Goettel, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 1-41
- ISSN
- 0022-2011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170891360
- Cited by
- 1,569
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 91.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009
- The paper
- Lacey, L. A., Grzywacz, D., Shapiro-Ilan, D. I., Frutos, R., Brownbridge, M., & Goettel, M. S. (2015). Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.