The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A security evaluation of IEC 62351
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Since network segmentation [110,111] is considered as a good security practice, it can be achieved by implementing BP1-CPNI [109], IEC 62351 [112], and NIST 800-82.”
From Industrial IoT, Cyber Threats, and Standards Landscape: Evaluation and Roadmap (2021) · cites this paper as [112]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fries, 2011, Security for the smart grid — enhancing IEC 62351 to improve security in energy automation control, Int J Adv Secur, 3, 169
- Genge, 2015, Cyber-security-aware network design of industrial control systems, IEEE Syst J, PP, 1, 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2462715 · DOI
- IEEE Standards Association, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of IEC 62351 Security Mechanisms for IEC 61850 Message Exchanges
Hussain, S. M. S., Ustun, T. S., & Kalam, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2956734 · Cited by 185
Industrial IoT, Cyber Threats, and Standards Landscape: Evaluation and Roadmap
Dhirani, L. L., Armstrong, E., & Newe, T. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21113901 · Cited by 172
“Since network segmentation [110,111] is considered as a good security practice, it can be achieved by implementing BP1-CPNI [109], IEC 62351 [112], and NIST 800-82.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlegel, R., Obermeier, S., & Schneider, J.
- Affiliations
- ABB (Switzerland) (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Schlegel, Roman
- Venue
- Journal of Information Security and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 34
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 2214-2126 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2417963146
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Security and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Systems and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Keywords
- IEC 62351, power system security, industrial automation security, security standards, authentication, integrity, confidentiality, protocol security, backward compatibility, security analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A security evaluation of IEC 62351. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jisa.2016.05.007
- The paper
- Schlegel, R., Obermeier, S., & Schneider, J. (2017). A security evaluation of IEC 62351. Journal of Information Security and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2016.05.007
