Cited by 65Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

Chaos and compressive sensing based novel image encryption scheme

Khan, Jan Sher, Kayhan, Sema Koç·2021·Journal of Information Security and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102711

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, J. S., & Kayhan, S. K.
Affiliations
Gaziantep University (TR)
Corresponding author
Khan, Jan Sher
Venue
Journal of Information Security and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
58
Pages
102711
ISSN
2214-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120643296
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Information Security and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Keywords
image encryption, chaos-based cryptography, compressed sensing, orthogonal matching pursuit, chosen-plaintext attack resistance, bandwidth reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review