The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity and uniformity in statistical randomness tests
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies have examined the NIST test to evaluate its quality and assess statistical errors, for example, the reader can refer to22–24.”
Citations
Cites
On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P
Fisher, R. A. (1922) · Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2340521 · Cited by 2,975
Rukhin, A., Sota, J., Nechvatal, J., Smid, M., Barker, E., Leigh, S., Levenson, M., Vangel, M., Banks, D., Heckert, A., et al. (2000) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-22 · Cited by 1,867
TestU01: A C library for empirical testing of random number generators
L'Ecuyer, P., & Simard, R. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/1268776.1268777 · Cited by 1,014
2014 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)
(2014) · doi:10.1109/iscas31212.2014 · Cited by 299
Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods
Gentle, J. E. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b97336 · Cited by 250
Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
(2010) · doi:10.1145/1920261 · Cited by 166
Personalised cryptographic key generation based on FaceHashing
Teoh, A. B. J., Ngo, D. C. L., & Goh, A. (2004) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2004.06.002 · Cited by 143
2007 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP '07)
(2007) · doi:10.1109/sp12743.2007 · Cited by 137
Substitution box generation using Chaos: An image encryption application
Silva-García, V. M., Flores-Carapia, R., Rentería-Márquez, C., Luna-Benoso, B., & Aldape-Pérez, M. (2018) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.019 · Cited by 99
A secret sharing scheme based on cellular automata
del Rey, A. M., Mateus, J. P., & Rodríguez, G. (2005) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.026 · Cited by 60
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mehta, 1983, A network algorithm for performing Fisher’s exact test in r × c contingency tables, J Amer Statist Assoc, 78, 427
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salehi, R., Malik, A. W., Novotny, M. A., & Khan, S. U. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-51033-9 · Cited by 1
“Several studies have examined the NIST test to evaluate its quality and assess statistical errors, for example, the reader can refer to 22–24 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Almaraz Luengo, E., Leiva Cerna, M., García Villalba, L. J., Hurley-Smith, D., & Hernandez-Castro, J.
- Affiliations
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- University of Kent (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Information Security and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 103322
- ISSN
- 2214-2126 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4295364736
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Information Security and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T001011/1)
- Horizon 2020 (101021801)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Keywords
- randomness testing, sensitivity measures, uniformity testing, FIPS 140-2, NIST SP 800-22, TestU01, ENT, independence testing, cryptographic randomness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
