The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved l-diversity: Scalable anonymization approach for Privacy Preserving Big Data Publishing
Open accessAbstract
In the era of big data analytics, data owner is more concern about the data privacy. Data anonymization approaches such as k-anonymity, l-diversity, and t-closeness are used for a long time to preserve privacy in published data. However, these approaches cannot be directly applicable to a large amount of data. Distributed programming framework such as MapReduce and Spark are used for big data analytics which add more challenges to privacy preserving data publishing. Recently, we identified few scalable approaches for Privacy Preserving Big Data Publishing in literature and majority of them are based on k-anonymity and l-diversity. However, these approaches require a significant improvement to reach the level of existing privacy preserving data publishing approaches, therefore, we propose Improved Scalable l-Diversity (ImSLD) approach which is the extension of Improved Scalable k-Anonymity (ImSKA) for scalable anonymization in this paper. Our approaches are based on scalable k-anonymization that uses MapReduce as a programming paradigm. We use poker dataset and synthesize big data versions of poker dataset to test our approaches. The result analysis shows significant improvement in terms of running time due to the lesser number of MapReduce iterations and also exhibits lower information loss as compared to existing approaches while providing the same level of privacy due to tight arrangement of the records in the initial equivalence class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Common anonymization methods include k-anonymity, l-diversity, and t-closeness [128, 159, 160].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [160]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, l-diversity alone cannot entirely prevent attribute disclosure [160, 165].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [160]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
L -diversity: Privacy beyond k -anonymity
Machanavajjhala, A., Kifer, D., Gehrke, J., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/1217299.1217302 · Cited by 3,617
t-Closeness: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity and l-Diversity
Li, N., Li, T., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2007.367856 · Cited by 3,451
Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704 · cited 1×
“…considered to be one of the most popular privacy preserving data publishing approaches and suitable for big data analytics (Mehta et al., 2016). k -anonymity suffers with the record linkage attack (Fung et al., 2010) when there is an insufficient diversity between sensitive values in the dataset.”
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Fung, 2007, Anonymizing classification data for privacy preservation, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19, 711, 10.1109/TKDE.2007.1015 · DOI
- Hay, 2008, Resisting structural re-identification in anonymized social networks, Proc. VLDB Endowment, 1, 102, 10.14778/1453856.1453873 · DOI
- Jain, 2016, Big data privacy: a technological perspective and review, J. Big Data, 3, 25, 10.1186/s40537-016-0059-y · DOI
- Mehta, 2016, Privacy preserving unstructured big data analytics: Issues and challenges, Procedia Comput. Sci., 78, 120, 10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.020 · DOI
- Mehta, 2017, Privacy preserving big data publishing: a scalable k-anonymization approach using MapReduce, IET Software, 11, 271, 10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0264 · DOI
- Mehta, 2018, Toward scalable anonymization for privacy preserving big data publishing, Recent Findings Intell. Comput. Tech., 708, 297, 10.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_31 · DOI
- Mehta, 2019, Towards privacy preserving unstructured big data publishing, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36, 3471, 10.3233/JIFS-181231 · DOI
- Nergiz, 2009, Multirelational k-anonymity, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 21, 1104, 10.1109/TKDE.2008.210 · DOI
- Sangeetha, 2019, Privacy of big data: a review, Handbook Big Data IoT Secur., 5, 10.1007/978-3-030-10543-3_2 · DOI
- Zakerzadeh, 2013, Delay-sensitive approaches for anonymizing numerical streaming data, Int. J. Inf. Secur., 12, 423, 10.1007/s10207-013-0196-7 · DOI
- Zhang, 2014, A hybrid approach for scalable sub-tree anonymization over big data using MapReduce on cloud, J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 80, 1008, 10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.007 · DOI
- Zhang, 2014, A scalable two-phase top-down specialization approach for data anonymization using MapReduce on cloud, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 25, 363, 10.1109/TPDS.2013.48 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehta, B. B., & Rao, U. P.
- Affiliations
- Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Mehta, Brijesh B.
- Venue
- Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1423-1430
- ISSN
- 1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2967268087
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Quality and Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Keywords
- l-diversity, k-anonymity, data anonymization, privacy-preserving data publishing, big data privacy, scalability, MapReduce, equivalence classes, information loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review