Cited by 57Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataData Quality and ManagementCloud Data Security Solutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved l-diversity: Scalable anonymization approach for Privacy Preserving Big Data Publishing

Open access
Mehta, Brijesh B., Rao, Udai Pratap·2022·Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences

Abstract

In the era of big data analytics, data owner is more concern about the data privacy. Data anonymization approaches such as k-anonymity, l-diversity, and t-closeness are used for a long time to preserve privacy in published data. However, these approaches cannot be directly applicable to a large amount of data. Distributed programming framework such as MapReduce and Spark are used for big data analytics which add more challenges to privacy preserving data publishing. Recently, we identified few scalable approaches for Privacy Preserving Big Data Publishing in literature and majority of them are based on k-anonymity and l-diversity. However, these approaches require a significant improvement to reach the level of existing privacy preserving data publishing approaches, therefore, we propose Improved Scalable l-Diversity (ImSLD) approach which is the extension of Improved Scalable k-Anonymity (ImSKA) for scalable anonymization in this paper. Our approaches are based on scalable k-anonymization that uses MapReduce as a programming paradigm. We use poker dataset and synthesize big data versions of poker dataset to test our approaches. The result analysis shows significant improvement in terms of running time due to the lesser number of MapReduce iterations and also exhibits lower information loss as compared to existing approaches while providing the same level of privacy due to tight arrangement of the records in the initial equivalence class.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.08.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Fung, 2007, Anonymizing classification data for privacy preservation, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19, 711, 10.1109/TKDE.2007.1015 · DOI
  2. Hay, 2008, Resisting structural re-identification in anonymized social networks, Proc. VLDB Endowment, 1, 102, 10.14778/1453856.1453873 · DOI
  3. Jain, 2016, Big data privacy: a technological perspective and review, J. Big Data, 3, 25, 10.1186/s40537-016-0059-y · DOI
  4. Mehta, 2016, Privacy preserving unstructured big data analytics: Issues and challenges, Procedia Comput. Sci., 78, 120, 10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.020 · DOI
  5. Mehta, 2017, Privacy preserving big data publishing: a scalable k-anonymization approach using MapReduce, IET Software, 11, 271, 10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0264 · DOI
  6. Mehta, 2018, Toward scalable anonymization for privacy preserving big data publishing, Recent Findings Intell. Comput. Tech., 708, 297, 10.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_31 · DOI
  7. Mehta, 2019, Towards privacy preserving unstructured big data publishing, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36, 3471, 10.3233/JIFS-181231 · DOI
  8. Nergiz, 2009, Multirelational k-anonymity, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 21, 1104, 10.1109/TKDE.2008.210 · DOI
  9. Sangeetha, 2019, Privacy of big data: a review, Handbook Big Data IoT Secur., 5, 10.1007/978-3-030-10543-3_2 · DOI
  10. Zakerzadeh, 2013, Delay-sensitive approaches for anonymizing numerical streaming data, Int. J. Inf. Secur., 12, 423, 10.1007/s10207-013-0196-7 · DOI
  11. Zhang, 2014, A hybrid approach for scalable sub-tree anonymization over big data using MapReduce on cloud, J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 80, 1008, 10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.007 · DOI
  12. Zhang, 2014, A scalable two-phase top-down specialization approach for data anonymization using MapReduce on cloud, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 25, 363, 10.1109/TPDS.2013.48 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Mehta, B. B., & Rao, U. P.
Affiliations
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN)
Corresponding author
Mehta, Brijesh B.
Venue
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
Published
2022-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
1423-1430
ISSN
1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967268087
Cited by
57
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Quality and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
l-diversity, k-anonymity, data anonymization, privacy-preserving data publishing, big data privacy, scalability, MapReduce, equivalence classes, information loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review