The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Capsule Networks – A survey
Open accessAbstract
Modern day computer vision tasks requires efficient solution to problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, object detection, object segmentation and language translation. Symbolic Artificial Intelligence with its hard coding rules is incapable of solving these complex problems resulting in the introduction of Deep Learning (DL) models such as Recurrent Neural Networks and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). However, CNNs require lots of training data and are incapable of recognizing pose and deformation of objects leading to the introduction of Capsule Networks. Capsule Networks are the new sensation in Deep Learning. They have lived to this expectation as their performance in relation to the above problems has been better than Convolutional Neural Networks. Even with this promise in performance, lack of architectural knowledge and inner workings of Capsules serves as a hindrance for researchers to take full advantage of this breakthrough. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the state of the art architectures, tools and methodologies in existing implementations of capsule networks. We highlight the successes, failures and opportunities for further research to serve as a motivation to researchers and industry players to exploit the full potential of this new field. The main contribution of this survey article is that it explains and summarizes significant current state of the art Capsule Network architectures and implementations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms
Xiao, H., Rasul, K., & Vollgraf, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.07747 · Cited by 6,108
Cited by
Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey
Krichen, M. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12080151 · Cited by 623
Deep learning for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A survey
Khojaste-Sarakhsi, M., Haghighi, S. S., Ghomi, S. M. T. F., & Marchiori, E. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102332 · Cited by 194
Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networks
Räuker, T., Ho, A., Casper, S., & Hadfield-Menell, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00039 · Cited by 122
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in radiology and nuclear medicine: a literature review
de Vries, B. M., Zwezerijnen, G. J. C., Burchell, G. L., van Velden, F. H. P., Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. W., & Boellaard, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1180773 · Cited by 106
A Review of Deepfake Techniques: Architecture, Detection and Datasets
Edwards, P., Nebel, J.-C., Greenhill, D., & Liang, X. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3477257 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwabena Patrick, M., Felix Adekoya, A., Abra Mighty, A., & Edward, B. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1295-1310
- ISSN
- 1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2976711440
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capsule Networks – A survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.09.014
- The paper
- Kwabena Patrick, M., Felix Adekoya, A., Abra Mighty, A., & Edward, B. Y. (2022). Capsule Networks – A survey. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.09.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
