PreprintCited by 26,568Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesAdvanced Graph Neural Networks

Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space

Open access
Mikolov, Tomas, Chen, Kai, Corrado, Greg, Dean, Jeffrey·2013·arXiv

Abstract

We propose two novel model architectures for computing continuous vector representations of words from very large data sets. The quality of these representations is measured in a word similarity task, and the results are compared to the previously best performing techniques based on different types of neural networks. We observe large improvements in accuracy at much lower computational cost, i.e. it takes less than a day to learn high quality word vectors from a 1.6 billion words data set. Furthermore, we show that these vectors provide state-of-the-art performance on our test set for measuring syntactic and semantic word similarities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even during the pre-train and fine-tune paradigm, there was some use of pre-trained LMs exemplified by word2vec and GloVe, but they were used for only a limited portion of the final model parameters.

    “Even during this stage, there was some use of pre-trained LMs exemplified by word2vec[85,86] and GloVe[95], but they were used for only a limited portion of the final model parameters.”

    From Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [85]

    Section 1.2 (p. 2) says this paper focuses on learning word vectors separately from a full neural language model and notes that word vectors can be used in NLP applications. Section 7 (p. 11) also reports that the authors published vectors for others to use. The paper does not establish that such vectors occupied only a limited portion of a downstream model’s final parameters; the separate GloVe citation is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Word2vec was proposed by Mikolov et al. (2013) and developed by Google.

    “Word embeddings are created using a model proposed by Mikolov et al. (2013), developed by Google.”

    From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. 2013

  • Word2Vec embeddings possess algebraic features; for an advanced Word2Vec model trained on English text, if 'closeness' is measured by cosine similarity, the vector V(w3) is most similar to the vector V(w0) - V(w1) + V(w2), where w0='king', w1='man', w2='woman', w3='queen'.

    “According to Mikolov et al. (2013), if 'closeness' is measured by cosine similarity, the vector V ( w 3 ) is most similar to the vector V ( w 0 ) -V ( w 1 ) + V ( w 2 ) .”

    From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. 2013

  • Models can undergo training on extensive textual datasets, subsequently utilizing the acquired knowledge for subsequent tasks through transfer learning.

    “Models can undergo training on extensive textual datasets, subsequently utilizing the acquired knowledge for subsequent tasks through transfer learning (Mikolov et al. 2013).”

    From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Mikolov et al. 2013

  • Distributed word representations can be created quickly using shallow networks, such as the Continuous Bag-of-Words (CBOW) model.

    “Distributed word representations can be created quickly using shallow networks, such as the Continuous Bag-of-Words (CBOW) model [19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1][1] Y. Bengio, R. Ducharme, P. Vincent. A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1137-1155, 2003. -
  2. [5][5] R. Collobert, J. Weston, L. Bottou, M. Karlen, K. Kavukcuoglu and P. Kuksa. Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:24932537, 2011. -
  3. [9][9] Eric H. Huang, R. Socher, C. D. Manning and Andrew Y. Ng. Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes. In: Proc. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. -
  4. [10][10] G.E. Hinton, J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart. Distributed representations. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations, MIT Press, 1986. -
  5. [13][13] T. Mikolov. Language Modeling for Speech Recognition in Czech, Masters thesis, Brno University of Technology, 2007. -
  6. [14][14] T. Mikolov, J. Kopeck´ y, L. Burget, O. Glembek and J. ˇ Cernock´ y. Neural network based language models for higly inflective languages, In: Proc. ICASSP 2009. -
  7. [18][18] T. Mikolov, A. Deoras, D. Povey, L. Burget, J. ˇ Cernock´ y. Strategies for Training Large Scale Neural Network Language Models, In: Proc. Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, 2011. -
  8. [19][19] T. Mikolov. Statistical Language Models based on Neural Networks. PhD thesis, Brno University of Technology, 2012. -
  9. [21][21] T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. Accepted to NIPS 2013. -
  10. [25][25] F. Morin, Y. Bengio. Hierarchical Probabilistic Neural Network Language Model. AISTATS, 2005. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1614298861
Cited by
26,568
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 160 · 2025: 1031 · 2024: 1852 · 2023: 2491 · 2022: 2436 · 2021: 3947 · 2020: 3679 · 2019: 3494 · 2018: 2934 · 2017: 1991 · 2016: 1405 · 2015: 853 · 2014: 254 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Keywords
word embeddings, word representation learning, word similarity, computational efficiency, syntactic similarity, semantic similarity, neural network architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review