The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300202 · Cited by 2,084
A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery
Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152082 · Cited by 2,058
Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence
Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070301291002 · Cited by 2,002
Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358 · Cited by 1,460
Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning
Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00179-5 · Cited by 581
Patterson, P. G., Cowley, E., & Prasongsukarn, K. (2006) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.004 · Cited by 525
An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA
Carmignani, G. (2009) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.009 · Cited by 150
Varela-Neira, C., Vázquez-Casielles, R., & Iglesias-Argüelles, V. (2008) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642060801917612 · Cited by 103
Karnon, J., McIntosh, A., Dean, J., Bath, P., Hutchinson, A., Oakley, J., Thomas, N., Pratt, P., Freeman-Parry, L., Karsh, B.-T., et al. (2007) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.026 · Cited by 26 · cited 1×
“48 A prospective hazard and improvement analytic approach to predicting the effectiveness of medication error interventions (Karnon et al., 2007) PHIA Quantitative Facts Medicine JSS”
Method
Cited by
Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR-based approach for safety risk assessment in mine industry
Gul, M., Ak, M. F., & Guneri, A. F. (2019) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.005 · Cited by 180
Mohammadfam, I., & Zarei, E. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.117 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Marhavilas, P. K., Koulouriotis, D., & Gemeni, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 477-523
- ISSN
- 0950-4230 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120191631
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 21.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.004
- The paper
- Marhavilas, P. K., Koulouriotis, D., & Gemeni, V. (2011). Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
