Cited by 525Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyService and Product InnovationCultural Differences and Values

Service failure recovery: The moderating impact of individual-level cultural value orientation on perceptions of justice

Patterson, Paul G., Cowley, Elizabeth, Prasongsukarn, Kriengsin·2006·International Journal of Research in Marketing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.004

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of different justice dimensions remains unclear; some studies show distributive justice is the most important determinant of post-complaint satisfaction, while others find it weaker than procedural and/or interactional justice.

    “Similarly, the importance of different justice dimensions remains unclear.”

    From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Patterson, Cowley, and Prasongsukarn 2006

  • Customers who perceive the organizational response to a complaint as fair display higher levels of post-complaint satisfaction than those who perceive the response as unfair.

    “Justice theory is used in more recent studies, which provide evidence that customers, who perceive the organizational response to a complaint as fair, display higher levels of post-complaint satisfaction than those who perceive the response as unfair (Maxham III and Netemeyer 2002; Patterson, Cowley, and Prasongsukarn 2006; Smith, Bolton, and Wagner 1999).”

    From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Patterson, Cowley, and Prasongsukarn 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patterson, P. G., Cowley, E., & Prasongsukarn, K.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Assumption University (TH)
Corresponding author
Patterson, Paul G.
Venue
International Journal of Research in Marketing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
263-277
ISSN
0167-8116 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966247556
Cited by
525
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
25.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Research in Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
service recovery, cultural value orientations, perceptions of justice, distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, collectivism, apology, cognitive control, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, Eastern and Western cultures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review