The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Examination of Perceived Organizational Support as a Multidimensional Construct in the Context of an Expatriate Assignment
Abstract
We examined a multidimensional measure of perceived organizational support (adjustment POS, career POS, and financial POS) within an integtrative stress model of expatriate success. Expatriate success was defined in terms of multiple criteria and the predictors included role stressors, situational stressors, supervisor support, and POS. Hypotheses were tested with 230 expatriate–supervisor dyads and S.E.M. analyses. Support was found for a partially mediated model. The results showed that the POS dimensions differentially predicted expatriate success criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Cited by
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311415280 · Cited by 1,625
Lee, L.-Y., & Kartika, N. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.030 · Cited by 101
Supported Supervisors Are More Supportive, but Why? A Multilevel Study of Mechanisms and Outcomes
Frear, K. A., Donsbach, J., Theilgard, N., & Shanock, L. R. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9485-2 · Cited by 53
Sokro, E., Obuobisa-Darko, T., & Okpattah, B. (2025) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-03-2024-0150
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraimer, M. L., & Wayne, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-237
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W1997872259
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
