The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement
Abstract
Abstract Due to the feasibility of economically producing large-scale metal components with relatively high deposition rates, significant progress has been made in the understanding of the Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process, as well as the microstructure and mechanical properties of the fabricated components. As WAAM has evolved, a wide range of materials have become associated with the process and its applications. This article reviews the emerging research on WAAM techniques and the commonly used metallic feedstock materials, and also provides a comprehensive over view of the metallurgical and material properties of the deposited parts. Common defects produced in WAAM components using different alloys are described, including deformation, porosity, and cracking. Methods for improving the fabrication quality of the additively manufactured components are discussed, taking into account the requirements of the various alloys. This paper concludes that the wide application of WAAM still presents many challenges, and these may need to be addressed in specific ways for different materials in order to achieve an operational system in an acceptable time frame. The integration of materials and manufacturing process to produce defect-free and structurally-sound deposited parts remains a crucial effort into the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Cited by
Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing
Qin, J., Hu, F., Liu, Y., Witherell, P., Wang, C. C. L., Rosen, D. W., Simpson, T. W., Lu, Y., & Tang, Q. (2022) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102691 · Cited by 391
Wang, S., Ning, J., Zhu, L., Yang, Z., Yan, W., Dun, Y., Xue, P., Xu, P., Bose, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2022) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2022.08.014 · Cited by 279
Shiyas, K. A., & Ramanujam, R. (2021) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.016 · Cited by 60
Wire arc additive manufacturing of low alloyed steels, copper aluminum alloys, and their bimetals
Karamimoghadam, M., Aghayar, Y., Forooghi, F., Denora, V., Mohammadi, M., Contuzzi, N., & Casalino, G. (2025) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-025-16436-4 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, B., Pan, Z., Ding, D., Cuiuri, D., Li, H., Xu, J., & Norrish, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 127-139
- ISSN
- 1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887955127
- Cited by
- 1,577
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 52.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001
- The paper
- Wu, B., Pan, Z., Ding, D., Cuiuri, D., Li, H., Xu, J., & Norrish, J. (2018). A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.