The DOI matches its Crossref record; 222 of the 222 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: A critical review
Abstract
Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) is a digital manufacturing technology, rapidly revolutionizing in the medical sectors for printing of distinct body parts having intrinsic shapes and offering customized solutions to every patient. In the past few decades, AM is used as a versatile and cost-effective method for the manufacturing of geometrically complicated shape in the medical industry. In addition, AM technology is used for the development of products from dental implants to heart valves and joint replacements etc. This is the technology that makes a physical model directly from CAD models by adding materials in layer by layer fashion and offers robust mechanical properties. This review paper aims to consolidate the contribution of various researchers in the area of AM especially focusing the applications in the medical field using various technologies of AM, materials and their mechanical properties, so that this review paper could become the torch bearer for the futuristic researchers working in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034
Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review
Staiger, M. P., Pietak, A. M., Huadmai, J., & Dias, G. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 · Cited by 4,452
Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Role of Porosity and Pore Size
Loh, Q. L., & Choong, C. (2013) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 · Cited by 2,668
Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS
Ahn, S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540210441166 · Cited by 2,382
Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities
Tofail, S. A. M., Koumoulos, E. P., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S., O’Donoghue, L., & Charitidis, C. (2018) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 · Cited by 2,136
3D printing of ceramics: A review
Chen, Z., Li, Z., Li, J., Liu, C., Lao, C., Fu, Y., Liu, C., Li, Y., Wang, P., & He, Y. (2019) · Journal of the European Ceramic Society · doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 · Cited by 2,109
The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: A review☆
Witte, F. (2010) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028 · Cited by 1,860
Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences
Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403397r · Cited by 1,746
An Overview of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid (PLGA)-Based Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering
Gentile, P., Chiono, V., Carmagnola, I., & Hatton, P. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms15033640 · Cited by 1,593
The development of binary Mg–Ca alloys for use as biodegradable materials within bone
Li, Z., Gu, X., Lou, S., & Zheng, Y. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021 · Cited by 1,593
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, R., Kumar, M., & Chohan, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 828-850
- ISSN
- 1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3132825741
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 222
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022
- The paper
- Kumar, R., Kumar, M., & Chohan, J. S. (2021). The role of additive manufacturing for biomedical applications: A critical review. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
