The DOI matches its Crossref record; 180 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: Processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends
Open accessAbstract
Laser Powder Bed Fusion process is regarded as the most versatile metal additive manufacturing process, which has been proven to manufacture near net shape up to 99.9% relative density, with geometrically complex and high-performance metallic parts at reduced time. Steels and iron-based alloys are the most predominant engineering materials used for structural and sub-structural applications. Availability of steels in more than 3500 grades with their wide range of properties including high strength, corrosion resistance, good ductility, low cost, recyclability etc., have put them in forefront of other metallic materials. However, LPBF process of steels and iron-based alloys have not been completely established in industrial applications due to: (i) limited insight available in regards to the processing conditions, (ii) lack of specific materials standards, and (iii) inadequate knowledge to correlate the process parameters and other technical obstacles such as dimensional accuracy from a design model to actual component, part variability, limited feedstock materials, manual post-processing and etc. Continued efforts have been made to address these issues. This review aims to provide an overview of steels and iron-based alloys used in LPBF process by summarizing their key process parameters, describing thermophysical phenomena that is strongly linked to the phase transformation and microstructure evolution during solidification, highlighting metallurgical defects and their potential control methods, along with the impact of various post-process treatments; all of this have a direct impact on the mechanical performance. Finally, a summary of LPBF processed steels and iron-based alloys with functional properties and their application perspectives are presented. This review can provide a foundation of knowledge on LPBF process of steels by identifying missing information from the existing literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Additive manufacturing of metals
Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E., & Emmelmann, C. (2016) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 · Cited by 4,759
Flemings, M. C. (1974) · Metallurgical transactions · doi:10.1007/bf02643923 · Cited by 3,403
Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms
Gu, D. D., Meiners, W., Wissenbach, K., & Poprawe, R. (2012) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1179/1743280411y.0000000014 · Cited by 3,197
Khairallah, S. A., Anderson, A. T., Rubenchik, A., & King, W. E. (2016) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 · Cited by 2,766
Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility
Wang, Y. M., Voisin, T., McKeown, J. T., Ye, J., Calta, N. P., Li, Z., Zeng, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Roehling, T. T., et al. (2018) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat5021 · Cited by 2,613
The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing
Sames, W. J., List, F. A., Pannala, S., Dehoff, R. R., & Babu, S. S. (2016) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 · Cited by 2,529
Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities
Tofail, S. A. M., Koumoulos, E. P., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S., O’Donoghue, L., & Charitidis, C. (2018) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 · Cited by 2,136
Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs
Guo, N., & Leu, M. C. (2013) · Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 · Cited by 2,073
Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting
Mercelis, P., & Kruth, J. (2006) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540610707013 · Cited by 2,015
Cited by
Khalid, M. Y., Arif, Z. U., Noroozi, R., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.035 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Narasimharaju, S. R., Zeng, W., See, T. L., Zhu, Z., Scott, P., Jiang, X., & Lou, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 75
- Pages
- 375-414
- ISSN
- 1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206401649
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 180
- FWCI
- 36.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: Processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.033
- The paper
- Narasimharaju, S. R., Zeng, W., See, T. L., Zhu, Z., Scott, P., Jiang, X., & Lou, S. (2022). A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: Processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.