Cited by 320Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

Extrusion-based additive manufacturing technologies: State of the art and future perspectives

Open access
Altıparmak, Sadettin Cem, Yardley, Victoria A., Shi, Zhusheng, Lin, Jianguo·2022·Journal of Manufacturing Processes

Abstract

Extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) has recently become widespread for the layer-by-layer fabrication of three-dimensional prototypes and components even with highly complex shapes. This technology involves extrusion through a nozzle by means of a plunger-, filament- or screw-based mechanism; where necessary, this is preceded by heating of the feedstock material to reduce its viscosity sufficiently to facilitate extrusion. Extrusion-based AM offers greater design freedom, larger building volumes and more cost-efficient production than liquid- and powder-based AM processes. Although this technology was originally developed for polymeric filament materials, it is now increasingly applied to a wide variety of material classes, including metallic, edible and construction materials. This is in part thanks to the recent development of AM-specific feedstock materials (AM materials), in which materials that are not intrinsically suited to extrusion, for example because of high melting points or brittleness, are combined with other, usually polymeric materials that can be more readily extruded. This paper comprehensively and systematically reviews the state of the art in the field of extrusion-based AM, including the techniques applied and the individual challenges and developments in each materials class for which the technology is being developed. The paper includes material- and process-centred suitability analysis of extrusion-based AM, and a comparison of this technology with liquid- and powder-based AM processes. Prospective applications of this technology are also briefly discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.032

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extrusion-based 3D printing is a common strategy because of low cost, simple and eco-friendly fabrication, high availability of materials, and diverse raw material forms.

    “extrusion-based 3D printing is a common strategy because of low cost, simple and eco-friendly fabrication, high availability of materials (metals, ceramics, polymers, hydrogels and their composites) and diverse raw material to process (wires, pellets, and powders) [18][19][20]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altıparmak, S. C., Yardley, V. A., Shi, Z., & Lin, J.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Yardley, Victoria A.
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
83
Pages
607-636
ISSN
1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297110346
Cited by
320
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 2
FWCI
15.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manufacturing Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Keywords
extrusion-based additive manufacturing, fused deposition modeling, filament extrusion, feedstock, polymer filaments, building materials, 3D printing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review