The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Genomic Analysis of 60 Mycobacteriophage Genomes: Genome Clustering, Gene Acquisition, and Gene Size
Open accessAbstract
Mycobacteriophages are viruses that infect mycobacterial hosts. Expansion of a collection of sequenced phage genomes to a total of sixty – all infecting a common bacterial host – provides further insight into their diversity and evolution. Of the sixty phage genomes, 55 can be grouped into nine clusters according to their nucleotide sequence similarities, five of which can be further divided into subclusters; five genomes do not cluster with other phages. The sequence diversity between genomes within a cluster varies greatly; for example, the six genomes in cluster D share more than 97.5% average nucleotide similarity with each other. In contrast, similarity between the two genomes in Cluster I is barely detectable by diagonal plot analysis. The total of 6,858 predicted ORFs have been grouped into 1523 phamilies (phams) of related sequences, 46% of which possess only a single member. Only 18.8% of the phams have sequence similarity to non-mycobacteriophage database entries and fewer than 10% of all phams can be assigned functions based on database searching or synteny. Genome clustering facilitates the identification of genes that are in greatest genetic flux and are more likely to have been exchanged horizontally in relatively recent evolutionary time. Although mycobacteriophage genes exhibit smaller average size than genes of their host (205 residues compared to 315), phage genes in higher flux average only ∼100 amino acids, suggesting that the primary units of genetic exchange correspond to single protein domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
Jordan, T. C., Burnett, S. H., Carson, S., Caruso, S. M., Clase, K., DeJong, R. J., Dennehy, J. J., Denver, D. R., Dunbar, D., Elgin, S. C. R., et al. (2014) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01051-13 · Cited by 509
Self-citationHatfull, G. F. (2018) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0026-2018 · Cited by 112
Self-citationMycobacteriophages: From Petri dish to patient
Hatfull, G. F. (2022) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1010602 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatfull, G. F., Jacobs-Sera, D., Lawrence, J. G., Pope, W. H., Russell, D. A., Ko, C.-C., Weber, R. J., Patel, M. C., Germane, K. L., Edgar, R. H., Hoyte, N. N., Bowman, C. A., Tantoco, A. T., Paladin, E. C., Myers, M. S., Smith, A. L., Grace, M. S., Pham, T. T., O'Brien, M. B., Vogelsberger, A. M., Hryckowian, A. J., Wynalek, J. L., Donis-Keller, H., Bogel, M. W., Peebles, C. L., Cresawn, S. G., & Hendrix, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 397
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-143
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016776575
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomic Analysis of 60 Mycobacteriophage Genomes: Genome Clustering, Gene Acquisition, and Gene Size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.01.011
- The paper
- Hatfull, G. F., Jacobs-Sera, D., Lawrence, J. G., Pope, W. H., Russell, D. A., Ko, C.-C., Weber, R. J., Patel, M. C., Germane, K. L., Edgar, R. H., Hoyte, N. N., Bowman, C. A., Tantoco, A. T., Paladin, E. C., Myers, M. S., Smith, A. L., Grace, M. S., Pham, T. T., O'Brien, M. B., . . . Hendrix, R. W. (2010). Comparative Genomic Analysis of 60 Mycobacteriophage Genomes: Genome Clustering, Gene Acquisition, and Gene Size. Journal of Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.01.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.