Cited by 157thermodynamics and calorimetric analysesComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Non-additivity of functional group contributions in protein-ligand binding: a comprehensive study by crystallography and isothermal titration calorimetry.

Baum, Bernhard, Muley, Laveena, Smolinski, Michael, Heine, Andreas, Hangauer, David, Klebe, Gerhard·2010·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

Additivity of functional group contributions to protein-ligand binding is a very popular concept in medicinal chemistry as the basis of rational design and optimized lead structures. Most of the currently applied scoring functions for docking build on such additivity models. Even though the limitation of this concept is well known, case studies examining in detail why additivity fails at the molecular level are still very scarce. The present study shows, by use of crystal structure analysis and isothermal titration calorimetry for a congeneric series of thrombin inhibitors, that extensive cooperative effects between hydrophobic contacts and hydrogen bond formation are intimately coupled via dynamic properties of the formed complexes. The formation of optimal lipophilic contacts with the surface of the thrombin S3 pocket and the full desolvation of this pocket can conflict with the formation of an optimal hydrogen bond between ligand and protein. The mutual contributions of the competing interactions depend on the size of the ligand hydrophobic substituent and influence the residual mobility of ligand portions at the binding site. Analysis of the individual crystal structures and factorizing the free energy into enthalpy and entropy demonstrates that binding affinity of the ligands results from a mixture of enthalpic contributions from hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic contacts, and entropic considerations involving an increasing loss of residual mobility of the bound ligands. This complex picture of mutually competing and partially compensating enthalpic and entropic effects determines the non-additivity of free energy contributions to ligand binding at the molecular level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.02.007

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The advantage of nonlinear scoring functions partially circumvents the problematic modeling assumptions of linear models.

    “This advantage of nonlinear scoring functions partially circumvents the problematic modeling assumptions of linear models (Dill, 1997; Baum et al., 2010; Sotriffer, 2012).”
  • Machine learning-based scoring functions using advanced algorithms such as random forest and deep convolutional neural networks can characterize non-additive contributions of functional groups in protein-ligand binding interactions.

    “By using advanced machine learning algorithms, such as random forest (RF) and deep convolutional neural network, the machine learning-based SFs can characterize the non-additive contributions of functional groups in protein–ligand binding interactions [18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baum, B., Muley, L., Smolinski, M., Heine, A., Hangauer, D., & Klebe, G.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
  • Muley, Laveena
  • Smolinski, Michael
  • Hangauer, David
  • Klebe, Gerhard
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
397
Issue
4
Pages
1042-1054
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025557696
Cited by
157
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HZB Repository (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH (HZB)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • CSL Behring
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
protein-ligand binding, non-additive effects, functional group contributions, thrombin inhibitors, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, cooperativity, enthalpy-entropy compensation, binding free energy, ligand flexibility, congeneric series, docking scoring functions
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Calorimetry, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Thrombin, Crystallography, X-Ray, Entropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review