Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of the In-Silico-Designed Kemp Eliminase KE70 by Computational Design and Directed Evolution

Open access
Khersonsky, Olga, Röthlisberger, Daniela, Wollacott, Andrew M., Murphy, Paul, Dym, Orly, Albeck, Shira, Kiss, Gert, Houk, K.N., Baker, David, Tawfik, Dan S.·2011·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

Although de novo computational enzyme design has been shown to be feasible, the field is still in its infancy: the kinetic parameters of designed enzymes are still orders of magnitude lower than those of naturally occurring ones. Nonetheless, designed enzymes can be improved by directed evolution, as recently exemplified for the designed Kemp eliminase KE07. Random mutagenesis and screening resulted in variants with >200-fold higher catalytic efficiency, and provided insights about features missing in the designed enzyme. Here we describe the optimization of KE70, another designed Kemp eliminase. Amino acid substitutions predicted to improve catalysis in design calculations involving extensive backbone sampling were individually tested. Those proven beneficial were combinatorially incorporated into the originally designed KE70 along with random mutations, and the resulting libraries were screened for improved eliminase activity. Nine rounds of mutation and selection resulted in >400-fold improvement in the catalytic efficiency of the original KE70 design, reflected in both higher kcat and lower KM values, with the best variants exhibiting kcat/KM values of >5x104 s−1M−1. The optimized KE70 variants were characterized structurally and biochemically providing insights into the origins of the improvements in catalysis. Three primary contributions were identified: first, the reshaping of the active site cavity to achieve tighter substrate binding; second, the fine-tuning of the electrostatics around the catalytic His-Asp dyad; and third, stabilization of the active-site dyad in a conformation optimal for catalysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.041

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Khersonsky, O., Röthlisberger, D., Wollacott, A. M., Murphy, P., Dym, O., Albeck, S., Kiss, G., Houk, K. N., Baker, D., & Tawfik, D. S.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
407
Issue
3
Pages
391-412
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101060473
Cited by
177
References
2
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of the In-Silico-Designed Kemp Eliminase KE70 by Computational Design and Directed Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.041
The paper
Khersonsky, O., Röthlisberger, D., Wollacott, A. M., Murphy, P., Dym, O., Albeck, S., Kiss, G., Houk, K. N., Baker, D., & Tawfik, D. S. (2011). Optimization of the In-Silico-Designed Kemp Eliminase KE70 by Computational Design and Directed Evolution. Journal of Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.