Cited by 6Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

drMD: Molecular Dynamics for Experimentalists

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can be used by protein scientists to investigate a wide array of biologically relevant properties such as the effects of mutations on a protein’s structure and activity, or probing intermolecular interactions with small molecule substrates or other macromolecules. Within the world of computational structural biology, several programs have become popular for running these simulations, but each of these programs requires a significant time investment from the researcher to run even simple simulations. Even after learning how to run and analyse simulations, many elements remain a “black box.” This greatly limits the accessibility of molecular dynamics simulations for non-experts. Here we present drMD, an automated pipeline for running molecular dynamics simulations using the OpenMM molecular mechanics toolkit. We have created drMD with non-experts in computational biology in mind. The drMD codebase has several functions that automatically handle routine procedures associated with running molecular dynamics simulations. This greatly reduces the expertise required to run MD simulations. We have also introduced a series of quality-of-life features to make the process of running MD simulations both easier and more pleasant. Finally, drMD explains the steps it is taking interactively and, where useful, provides relevant references so the user can learn more. All these features make drMD an effective tool for learning molecular dynamics while running publication-quality simulations. drMD is open source and can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/wells-wood-research/drMD .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168918

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Maveyraud, 2020, Protein X-ray crystallography and drug discovery, Molecules, 25, 1030, 10.3390/molecules25051030 · DOI
  2. Ishima, 2000, Protein dynamics from NMR, Nature Struct. Biol., 7, 10.1038/78963 · DOI
  3. Chen, 2020, Unveiling conformational dynamics changes of H-Ras induced by mutations based on accelerated molecular dynamics, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 22, 21238, 10.1039/D0CP03766D · DOI
  4. Wan, 2011, Molecular dynamics simulation reveals structural and thermodynamic features of kinase activation by cancer mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor, J. Comput. Chem., 32, 2843, 10.1002/jcc.21866 · DOI
  5. Daggett, 1990, Molecular dynamics simulations of active site mutants of triosephosphate isomerase, Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 3, 677, 10.1093/protein/3.8.677 · DOI
  6. Merlino, 2005, The importance of dynamic effects on the enzyme activity, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 17953, 10.1074/jbc.M501339200 · DOI
  7. Raniolo, 2020, Ligand binding free-energy calculations with funnel metadynamics, Nature Protoc., 15, 2837, 10.1038/s41596-020-0342-4 · DOI
  8. Åqvist, 2002, Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations, Acc. Chem. Res., 35, 358, 10.1021/ar010014p · DOI
  9. Siebenmorgen, 2020, Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities, Wires Comput. Mol. Sci., 10, e1448, 10.1002/wcms.1448 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Filgueiras, 2023, Protein structure prediction with energy minimization and deep learning approaches, Nature Comput., 22, 659, 10.1007/s11047-023-09943-4 · DOI
  11. Eastman, 2017, OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics, PLoS Comput. Biol., 13, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Abraham, 2015, GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX, 1–2, 19, 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Phillips, 2020, Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD, J. Chem. Phys., 153, 10.1063/5.0014475 · DOI
  14. Wang, 2004, Development and testing of a general amber force field, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1157, 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI
  15. Brooks, 2009, CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program, J. Comput. Chem., 30, 1545, 10.1002/jcc.21287 · DOI
  16. Gecht, 2020, MDBenchmark: A toolkit to optimize the performance of molecular dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Phys., 153, 10.1063/5.0019045 · DOI
  17. Jo, 2008, CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM, J. Comput. Chem., 29, 1859, 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Humphrey, 1996, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J. Mol. Graph., 14, 33, 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. McNutt, 2021, GNINA 1.0: Molecular docking with deep learning, J. Cheminform., 13, 43, 10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2 · DOI
  20. Michaud-Agrawal, 2011, MDAnalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations, J. Comput. Chem., 32, 2319, 10.1002/jcc.21787 · DOI
  21. MDAnalysis: A Python Package for the Rapid Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations – SciPy Proceedings, (2016). https://proceedings.scipy.org/articles/Majora-629e541a-00e (accessed October 23, 2024).
  22. McGibbon, 2015, MDTraj: A modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories, Biophys. J., 109, 1528, 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015 · DOI
  23. Barducci, 2008, Well-tempered metadynamics: A smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.020603 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ormeño, 2024, Convergence and equilibrium in molecular dynamics simulations, Commun. Chem., 7, 26, 10.1038/s42004-024-01114-5 · DOI
  25. O’Boyle, 2011, Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox, J. Cheminform., 3, 33, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 · DOI
  26. Dolinsky, 2007, PDB2PQR: Expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W522, 10.1093/nar/gkm276 · DOI
  27. Dolinsky, 2004, PDB2PQR: An automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W665, 10.1093/nar/gkh381 · DOI
  28. Olsson, 2011, PROPKA3: Consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7, 525, 10.1021/ct100578z · DOI
  29. Da Costa, 2021, Assessment of the PETase conformational changes induced by poly(ethylene terephthalate) binding, Proteins, 89, 1340, 10.1002/prot.26155 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Shrimpton-Phoenix, E., Notari, E., Kluonis, T., & Wood, C. W.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Shrimpton-Phoenix, Eugene
  • Wood, Christopher W.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
437
Issue
15
Pages
168918
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405747274
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X003027/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
molecular dynamics simulation, OpenMM, metadynamics, enhanced sampling, protein simulation, simulation automation, reproducibility, open source software
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review