The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
drMD: Molecular Dynamics for Experimentalists
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can be used by protein scientists to investigate a wide array of biologically relevant properties such as the effects of mutations on a protein’s structure and activity, or probing intermolecular interactions with small molecule substrates or other macromolecules. Within the world of computational structural biology, several programs have become popular for running these simulations, but each of these programs requires a significant time investment from the researcher to run even simple simulations. Even after learning how to run and analyse simulations, many elements remain a “black box.” This greatly limits the accessibility of molecular dynamics simulations for non-experts. Here we present drMD, an automated pipeline for running molecular dynamics simulations using the OpenMM molecular mechanics toolkit. We have created drMD with non-experts in computational biology in mind. The drMD codebase has several functions that automatically handle routine procedures associated with running molecular dynamics simulations. This greatly reduces the expertise required to run MD simulations. We have also introduced a series of quality-of-life features to make the process of running MD simulations both easier and more pleasant. Finally, drMD explains the steps it is taking interactively and, where useful, provides relevant references so the user can learn more. All these features make drMD an effective tool for learning molecular dynamics while running publication-quality simulations. drMD is open source and can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/wells-wood-research/drMD .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Maveyraud, 2020, Protein X-ray crystallography and drug discovery, Molecules, 25, 1030, 10.3390/molecules25051030 · DOI
- Ishima, 2000, Protein dynamics from NMR, Nature Struct. Biol., 7, 10.1038/78963 · DOI
- Chen, 2020, Unveiling conformational dynamics changes of H-Ras induced by mutations based on accelerated molecular dynamics, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 22, 21238, 10.1039/D0CP03766D · DOI
- Wan, 2011, Molecular dynamics simulation reveals structural and thermodynamic features of kinase activation by cancer mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor, J. Comput. Chem., 32, 2843, 10.1002/jcc.21866 · DOI
- Daggett, 1990, Molecular dynamics simulations of active site mutants of triosephosphate isomerase, Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 3, 677, 10.1093/protein/3.8.677 · DOI
- Merlino, 2005, The importance of dynamic effects on the enzyme activity, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 17953, 10.1074/jbc.M501339200 · DOI
- Raniolo, 2020, Ligand binding free-energy calculations with funnel metadynamics, Nature Protoc., 15, 2837, 10.1038/s41596-020-0342-4 · DOI
- Åqvist, 2002, Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations, Acc. Chem. Res., 35, 358, 10.1021/ar010014p · DOI
- Siebenmorgen, 2020, Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities, Wires Comput. Mol. Sci., 10, e1448, 10.1002/wcms.1448 · DOI · Paper page
- Filgueiras, 2023, Protein structure prediction with energy minimization and deep learning approaches, Nature Comput., 22, 659, 10.1007/s11047-023-09943-4 · DOI
- Eastman, 2017, OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics, PLoS Comput. Biol., 13, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
- Abraham, 2015, GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX, 1–2, 19, 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Phillips, 2020, Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD, J. Chem. Phys., 153, 10.1063/5.0014475 · DOI
- Wang, 2004, Development and testing of a general amber force field, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1157, 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI
- Brooks, 2009, CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program, J. Comput. Chem., 30, 1545, 10.1002/jcc.21287 · DOI
- Gecht, 2020, MDBenchmark: A toolkit to optimize the performance of molecular dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Phys., 153, 10.1063/5.0019045 · DOI
- Jo, 2008, CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM, J. Comput. Chem., 29, 1859, 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
- Humphrey, 1996, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J. Mol. Graph., 14, 33, 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
- McNutt, 2021, GNINA 1.0: Molecular docking with deep learning, J. Cheminform., 13, 43, 10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2 · DOI
- Michaud-Agrawal, 2011, MDAnalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations, J. Comput. Chem., 32, 2319, 10.1002/jcc.21787 · DOI
- MDAnalysis: A Python Package for the Rapid Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations – SciPy Proceedings, (2016). https://proceedings.scipy.org/articles/Majora-629e541a-00e (accessed October 23, 2024).
- McGibbon, 2015, MDTraj: A modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories, Biophys. J., 109, 1528, 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015 · DOI
- Barducci, 2008, Well-tempered metadynamics: A smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.020603 · DOI · Paper page
- Ormeño, 2024, Convergence and equilibrium in molecular dynamics simulations, Commun. Chem., 7, 26, 10.1038/s42004-024-01114-5 · DOI
- O’Boyle, 2011, Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox, J. Cheminform., 3, 33, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 · DOI
- Dolinsky, 2007, PDB2PQR: Expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W522, 10.1093/nar/gkm276 · DOI
- Dolinsky, 2004, PDB2PQR: An automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W665, 10.1093/nar/gkh381 · DOI
- Olsson, 2011, PROPKA3: Consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7, 525, 10.1021/ct100578z · DOI
- Da Costa, 2021, Assessment of the PETase conformational changes induced by poly(ethylene terephthalate) binding, Proteins, 89, 1340, 10.1002/prot.26155 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Shrimpton-Phoenix, E., Notari, E., Kluonis, T., & Wood, C. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Shrimpton-Phoenix, Eugene
- Wood, Christopher W.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-08
- Volume
- 437
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 168918
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405747274
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/X003027/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- molecular dynamics simulation, OpenMM, metadynamics, enhanced sampling, protein simulation, simulation automation, reproducibility, open source software
- MeSH terms
- Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review