Constitutive modeling of crimped collagen fibrils in soft tissues
Abstract
A microstructurally oriented constitutive formulation for the hyperelastic response of crimped collagen fibrils existing in soft connective tissues is proposed. The model is based on observations that collagen fibrils embedded in a soft matrix crimp into a smooth three-dimensional pattern when unloaded. Following ideas presented by Beskos and Jenkins [Beskos, D., Jenkins, J., 1975. A mechanical model for mammalian tendon. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 42, 755-758] and Freed and Doehring [Freed, A., Doehring, T., 2005. Elastic model for crimped collagen fibrils. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 127, 587-593] the collagen fibril crimp is approximated by a cylindrical helix to represent the constitutive behavior of the hierarchical organized substructure of biological tissues at the fibrillar level. The model is derived from the nonlinear axial force-stretch relationship of an extensible helical spring, including the full extension of the spring as a limit case. The geometrically nonlinear solution of the extensible helical spring is carried out by an iterative procedure. The model only requires one material parameter and two geometrical parameters to be determined from experiments. The ability of the proposed model to reproduce the biomechanical response of fibrous tissues is demonstrated for fascicles from rat tail tendons, for porcine cornea strips, and for bovine Achilles tendons.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even within the in vivo cornea, on a micron scale, collagen fibrils are probably not straight but have a crimp as in other connective tissues.
“What has often been overlooked is that, even within the in vivo cornea, on a micron scale these fibrils are probably not straight but rather have a crimp as in other connective tissues (Grytz and Meschke, 2009).”
From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Grytz and Meschke, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneal structure and transparency
Meek, K. M., & Knupp, C. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grytz, R., & Meschke, G.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Grytz, Rafael
- Venue
- Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 522-533
- ISSN
- 1751-6161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092184020
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Keywords
- hyperelasticity, tendons, cornea, Achilles tendon, rat tail tendon, porcine cornea, bovine Achilles tendon
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cattle, Collagen, Models, Molecular, Stress, Mechanical, Swine, Protein Structure, Secondary, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review