Cited by 68Hernia repair and managementSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesElasticity and Material Modeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterizing the ex vivo mechanical properties of synthetic polypropylene surgical mesh

Li, Xinxin, Kruger, Jennifer A., Jor, Jessica W.Y., Wong, Vivien, Dietz, Hans P., Nash, Martyn P., Nielsen, Poul M.F.·2014·Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Abstract

The use of synthetic polypropylene mesh for hernia surgical repair and the correction of female pelvic organ prolapse have been controversial due to increasing post-operative complications, including mesh erosion, chronic pain, infection and support failure. These morbidities may be related to a mismatch of mechanical properties between soft tissues and the mesh. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the biomechanical behavior of Prolene polypropylene mesh (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ, USA), which is widely used for a variety of surgical repair procedures. The stiffness and permanent deformation of Prolene mesh were compared in different directions by performing uniaxial tensile failure tests, cyclic and creep tests at simulated physiological loads in the coursewise (0°), walewise (90°) and the diagonal (45°) directions. Failure tests suggest that the mechanical properties of the mesh is anisotropic; with response at 0° being the most compliant while 90° was the stiffest. Irreversible deformation and viscoelastic behavior were observed in both cyclic and creep tests. The anisotropic property may be relevant to the placement of mesh in surgery to maximize long term mesh performance. The considerable permanent deformation may be associated with an increased risk of post-operative support failure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.005

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Anurov, 2009, Effectiveness of experimental hernia repair depends on orientation of mesh implant with anisotropic structure, Hernia, 13
  2. Shek, 2012, How common is fixation failure after mesh kit surgery, Int. Urogynecol. J., 23, 154
  3. Wong, 2012, A comparison of two different forms of mesh fixation, Int. Urogynecol. J., 23, S124

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, X., Kruger, J. A., Jor, J. W. Y., Wong, V., Dietz, H. P., Nash, M. P., & Nielsen, P. M. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Nielsen, Poul M.F.
Venue
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
37
Pages
48-55
ISSN
1751-6161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017096048
Cited by
68
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
Keywords
Prolene mesh, hernia repair, pelvic organ prolapse, anisotropy, creep, cyclic loading, viscoelasticity, permanent deformation, mesh erosion, postoperative complications
MeSH terms
Elasticity, Materials Testing, Polypropylenes, Surgical Mesh, Viscosity, Anisotropy, Mechanical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review