The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation
Open accessAbstract
The mammalian brain is composed of an outer layer of gray matter, consisting of cell bodies, dendrites, and unmyelinated axons, and an inner core of white matter, consisting primarily of myelinated axons. Recent evidence suggests that microstructural differences between gray and white matter play an important role during neurodevelopment. While brain tissue as a whole is rheologically well characterized, the individual features of gray and white matter remain poorly understood. Here we quantify the mechanical properties of gray and white matter using a robust, reliable, and repeatable method, flat-punch indentation. To systematically characterize gray and white matter moduli for varying indenter diameters, loading rates, holding times, post-mortem times, and locations we performed a series of n=192 indentation tests. We found that indenting thick, intact coronal slices eliminates the common challenges associated with small specimens: it naturally minimizes boundary effects, dehydration, swelling, and structural degradation. When kept intact and hydrated, brain slices maintained their mechanical characteristics with standard deviations as low as 5% throughout the entire testing period of five days post mortem. White matter, with an average modulus of 1.895kPa±0.592kPa, was on average 39% stiffer than gray matter, p<0.01, with an average modulus of 1.389kPa±0.289kPa, and displayed larger regional variations. It was also more viscous than gray matter and responded less rapidly to mechanical loading. Understanding the rheological differences between gray and white matter may have direct implications on diagnosing and understanding the mechanical environment in neurodevelopment and neurological disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Materials and technologies for soft implantable neuroprostheses
Lacour, S. P., Courtine, G., & Guck, J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.63 · Cited by 738
Wang, M., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Wan, C., Pan, L., Pan, S., He, K., Neo, A., & Chen, X. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003014 · Cited by 451
Zhou, T., Hong, G., Fu, T.-M., Yang, X., Schuhmann, T. G., Viveros, R. D., & Lieber, C. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705509114 · Cited by 227
Viscoelastic parameter identification of human brain tissue
Budday, S., Sommer, G., Holzapfel, G. A., Steinmann, P., & Kuhl, E. (2017) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.014 · Cited by 178
Self-citationThe Future of Neuroimplantable Devices: A Materials Science and Regulatory Perspective
Obidin, N., Tasnim, F., & Dagdeviren, C. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901482 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Budday, S., Nay, R., de Rooij, R., Steinmann, P., Wyrobek, T., Ovaert, T. C., & Kuhl, E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 318-330
- ISSN
- 1751-6161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039162483
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.024
- The paper
- Budday, S., Nay, R., de Rooij, R., Steinmann, P., Wyrobek, T., Ovaert, T. C., & Kuhl, E. (2015). Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.