Cited by 11Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPlant and fungal interactionsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Comparative Study of the Neuropeptide-Y Sympathetic Nerves in Endometriotic Involved and Noninvolved Sacrouterine Ligaments in Women with Pelvic Endometriosis

Possover, Marc, Tersiev, Plamen, Angelov, Doychin N.·2009·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective To show the relationship between the neuropeptide-Y pelvic sympathetic nerves and neoangiogenesis in the development of endometriosis Design Prospective study. Setting Academic community teaching hospital. Patients Fifteen consecutive women with unilateral endometriotic infiltration of the sacrouterine ligaments. Interventions A laparoscopic excision/biopsy of involved and noninvolved parts of the sacrouterine ligaments were taken. The sections were incubated with the neuronal marker rabbit polyclonal anti-protein gene product 9.5 and rabbit polyclonal anti-neuropeptide-Y. We made a comparative study on the distribution of nerve fibers and their relationship to the vessels on intact and endometriotic involved tissue. Measurements and main results The results show that a large amount of nerves are present around the blood vessels in the endometriosis samples, and a large number of these nerves are neuropeptide-Y sympathetic nerves. Adrenergic fibers are also present in the intact control subjects, however, in significantly smaller amounts. Conclusion This finding shows a strong relationship between the neuropeptide-Y sympathetic pelvic nerves and the neoangiogenesis required for the development of endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.02.012

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Possover, M., Tersiev, P., & Angelov, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Klinik Hirslanden (CH)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Possover, Marc
Venue
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
340-343
ISSN
1553-4650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004594724
Cited by
11
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
pelvic endometriosis, neuropeptide Y, sympathetic nerves, neoangiogenesis, adrenergic fibers, protein gene product 9.5
MeSH terms
Adult, Biopsy, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Ligaments, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Neuropeptide Y, Prospective Studies, Sympathetic Nervous System, Pelvic Pain, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review