Long-term Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Rectal Endometriosis: Seven-year Follow-up of Patients Enrolled in a Randomized Trial
Abstract
Study objective To compare functional outcomes, recurrence rate, and pregnancy likelihood in patients undergoing conservative or radical surgery for deep rectal endometriosis followed up for 7 years. Design Prospective study in a cohort of patients enrolled in a 2-arm randomized trial from March 2011 to August 2013. Setting A tertiary referral center. Patients Fifty-five patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Interventions Patients underwent either segmental resection or nodule excision via shaving or disk excision, depending on randomization that was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. Measurements and main results The primary end point was the number of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation, frequent bowel movements, anal incontinence, or bladder dysfunction 24 months after surgery. The secondary end points were values of gastrointestinal and overall quality of life scores. The 7-year recurrence rates (new deep endometriosis nodules infiltrating the rectum) in the excision vs segmental resection arms were 7.4 % vs 0% (p = .24). One of the symptoms included in the definition of the primary outcomes was recorded in 55.6% vs 60.7% of patients (p = .79). However, 51.9% vs 53.6% of patients considered their bowel movements as normal (p = .99). An intention-to-treat comparison of overall quality of life scores did not find a difference between the 2 groups 7 years after surgery. At the end of the 7-year study period, 31 of 37 patients who tried to conceive were successful (83.8%), including 27 pregnancies (57.4%) resulting from natural conception and 20 pregnancies (42.6%) resulting from assisted reproductive technology procedures. The pregnancy rate was 82.4% vs 85% in the 2 arms (p = .99). A 75.7% live birth rate was recorded. At the end of the follow-up, there were 15 women with 1 child (40.5%) and 13 women with 2 children (35.1%). During the 7-year follow-up, the reoperation rates were 37% and 35.7%, respectively, in each arm (p = .84). Among the 27 reoperation procedures during the follow-up period, 11 (40.7%) were for postoperative complications, 7 (25.9%) were necessary before assisted reproductive technology management, 8 (29.6%) were for recurrent abdominal or pelvic pain, and 1 (3.7%) was for midline ventral hernia after pregnancy. Conclusion Our study did not reveal a considerable difference in terms of digestive functional outcomes, recurrence rate, reoperation risk, and pregnancy likelihood when conservative and radical rectal surgeries for deep endometriosis were compared 7 years after surgery. The postoperative pregnancy rate observed in our series was high.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent follow-up study of the ENDORE trial by Roman et al. reported insignificant postoperative results regarding constipation in the conservatively managed group compared to segmental resection.
“In addition, a recent follow‐up study of the RCT (ENDORE‐Trial) by Roman et al. reported insignificant postoperative results regarding constipation in the conservatively managed group when compared to SR. 33 , 34 , 35”
From Gastrointestinal function outcomes following radical and conservative colorectal surgery for deep endometriosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management
Abrao, M. S., Petraglia, F., Falcone, T., Keckstein, J., Osuga, Y., & Chapron, C. (2015) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv003 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Donnez, O., & Roman, H. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.006 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationLong-term functional outcomes following colorectal resection versus shaving for rectal endometriosis
Roman, H., Milles, M., Vassilieff, M., Resch, B., Tuech, J.-J., Huet, E., Darwish, B., & Abo, C. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.055 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationMalzoni, M., Di Giovanni, A., Exacoustos, C., Lannino, G., Capece, R., Perone, C., Rasile, M., & Iuzzolino, D. (2016) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.024 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Erdem, S., Imboden, S., Papadia, A., Lanz, S., Mueller, M. D., Gloor, B., & Worni, M. (2018) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000001047 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long‐term surgical outcomes of nerve‐sparing discoid and segmental resection for deep endometriosis
Darici, E., Denkmayr, D., Pashkunova, D., Dauser, B., Birsan, T., & Hudelist, G. (2022) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.14411 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Darici, E., Bokor, A., Pashkunova, D., Senft, B., Cimşit, N., & Hudelist, G. (2025) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.15023 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Robotic Management of Recurrent Rectal Endometriosis After Previous Segmental Bowel Resection
Canturk, M. M., D'Ancona, G., François, M. O., & Roman, H. (2024) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.021 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Roman, H., Huet, E., Bridoux, V., Khalil, H., Hennetier, C., Bubenheim, M., Braund, S., & Tuech, J.-J.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Roman, Horace
- Venue
- Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 767-775
- ISSN
- 1553-4650 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4213052758
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Keywords
- rectal endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, segmentectomy, endometriosis recurrence, bowel dysfunction, anal incontinence, quality of life, pregnancy rate, live birth rate, reoperation, long-term surgical outcomes, assisted reproduction, constipation
- MeSH terms
- Child, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Rectal Diseases, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review