The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x · Cited by 1,959
The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes
Zaromb, F. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.8.995 · Cited by 206
Jahncke, H., Hongisto, V., & Virjonen, P. (2013) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.08.007 · Cited by 95
Bäuml, K.-H. T., Holterman, C., & Abel, M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000025 · Cited by 71
Confucian Values as a Buffer Against Age-Based Stereotype Threat for Chinese Older Adults
Tan, S. C., & Barber, S. J. (2020) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gby049 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-335
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020161999
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003
- The paper
- Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
