The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a result, there is a growing body of literature that argues it is more appropriate to use generalized linear mixed-effects probit/logit models to analyze these types of accuracy data (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Quené and van den Bergh, 2008; Song et al., 2017).”
From Cognitive Mapping Without Vision: Comparing Wayfinding Performance After Learning From Digital Touchscreen-Based Multimodal Maps vs. Embossed Tactile Overlays (2020) · cites this paper as Dixon, 2008
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 18,636
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,214
Regression Models for Ordinal Data
McCullagh, P. (1980) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x · Cited by 4,453
Luce, R. (1959) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911299 · Cited by 2,603
The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables
Simpson, E. H. (1951) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x · Cited by 2,301 · cited 1×
“In Simpson’s paradox (Simpson, 1951), for example, the pattern of overall means may not reflect the pattern observed in individual conditions or with individual subjects.”
BackgroundAnalyzing linguistic data : a practical introduction to statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · Cited by 2,069
Handbook of mathematical psychology: I.
Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., & Galanter, E. (1963) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 1,999
Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7 · Cited by 1,143
Introductory Statistics with R
Dalgaard, P. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b97671 · Cited by 743
Luce, R. D. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 644
Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling
Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210812 · Cited by 619
Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix
Townsend, J. T. (1971) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213026 · Cited by 602
A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using R
Hothorn, T., & Everitt, B. J. (2014) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b17081 · Cited by 585
Introductory Statistics With R
Sandry, T. D. (2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s779 · Cited by 429
A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using R
Everitt, B., & Hothorn, T. (2006) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420010657 · Cited by 217
Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception
McClelland, J. L. (1991) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90002-6 · Cited by 191
Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model
Twilley, L. C., & Dixon, P. (2000) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210725 · Cited by 62
Self-citationStatistics for Psychologists: An Intermediate Course
Everitt, B. J. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 28
Context and homograph meaning resolution.
Dixon, P. A., & Twilley, L. C. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/h0087321 · Cited by 14
Self-citationStatistics for Psychologists: An Intermediate Course
Rowell, G. H. (2002) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/tas.2002.s3 · Cited by 11
Cole, T. (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980228)17:4
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded edition). Copenhagen: Danish Institute of Educational Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1960).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · Cited by 10,328
“Furthermore, none of the LMEM articles in the JML special issue (Baayen et al., 2008; Barr, 2008; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Mirman, Dixon, & Magnuson, 2008; Quené & van den Bergh, 2008) set a”
Dicks, M., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.3.706 · Cited by 355
Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict
Cohen, M. X., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00030 · Cited by 340
A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2015) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12088 · Cited by 326
“Specifically, measures of effect size for continuous data (such as Cohen’s d) are suboptimal for the analysis of accuracy data that are based on categorical veracity judgments (true vs. false; Dixon, 2008).”
MethodMagezi, D. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002 · Cited by 314
“…for continuous response variables from a normally distributed population, mixed-effects models can also be used for categorical response variables (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008). lme4 includes the function glmer which can be used for count data (Poisson distribution), binary/proportion data…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dixon, Peter
- ORCID
- Dixon, Peter
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-456
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055164605
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- repeated measures designs, logistic regression, conditional logistic regression, Rasch model, generalized linear mixed models, quasi-maximum likelihood estimation, response strength, effect size heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
