Cited by 330Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control

Shipstead, Zach, Lindsey, Dakota R.B., Marshall, Robyn L., Engle, Randall W.·2014·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 113 · Cited by 330

Authors
Shipstead, Z., Lindsey, D. R. B., Marshall, R. L., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Shipstead, Zach
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
72
Pages
116-141
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155566930
Cited by
330
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
50.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Naval Research (N00014-12-1-0406, N00014-12-1-1011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory capacity, primary memory, secondary memory, attentional control, individual differences, memory retrieval, complex span, fluid intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review