Cited by 146Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Bridging Cognitive Load and Self-Regulated Learning Research: A complementary approach to contemporary issues in educational research

Open access
de Bruin, Anique B.H., van Merriënboer, Jeroen J.G.·2017·Learning and Instruction

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This editorial introduces a special issue arguing that cognitive load theory (CLT) and self-regulated learning (SRL) research can be combined into a joint paradigm, with the cue-utilization framework as a bridging basis. It proposes that learners need diagnostic cues to monitor learning and regulate mental effort, and it positions six studies and two commentaries as a first step toward that agenda.

Key findings

  • The paper argues that CLT and SRL share common ground: both are based in learning and memory psychology, use subjective estimates such as mental effort and judgments of learning, and focus on self-directed learning.
  • The cue-utilization framework is proposed as the main bridge: monitoring and regulation judgments are inferential, and accuracy depends on cue diagnosticity and cue utilization.
  • The special issue contains six studies and two commentaries, organized around three research questions about what cues influence CL/SRL ratings, how cue use in CL and SRL is related, and how to design effective cue prompts.
  • The editorial states that developing a combined CLT-SRL theoretical approach and research paradigm will probably take at least as long as the 25 years it took to bring CLT and SRL research to their current state.

Methods

  • Design: conceptual/editorial introduction to a special issue, not an empirical study.
  • The paper reviews fundamentals of CLT and SRL, analyzes similarities and differences, and presents the cue-utilization framework as a basis for integration.
  • It then positions the six special-issue studies and two commentaries within a proposed joint CLT-SRL research agenda.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the special-issue studies and commentaries “should be seen as a very first step” in executing the joint research agenda.
  • It notes that the first two studies use tasks of relatively low ecological validity, though they are described as apt for answering the research questions.
  • The paper reports Sweller and Paas’s commentary objection that combining SRL and CLT is difficult because self-regulation is considered a biologically primary skill and therefore unteachable, whereas CLT stresses biologically secondary, domain-specific knowledge requiring explicit instruction.
  • Evident from the text: as an editorial, it presents no new empirical data and does not test the proposed joint paradigm directly.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.001

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationreasoning

    CLT and SRL research can be combined into one joint research paradigm that is relevant for contemporary and future developments in education.

    “can be combined into one joint research paradigm that is relevant for contemporary and future developments in education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    In all SRL theories, monitoring and control of learning play a central role.

    “Theories, however, show considerable overlap (e.g., Pintrich, Wolters, & Baxter, 2000;Winne & Hadwin, 2008) and in all of them monitoring and control (regulation) of learning play a central role.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pintrich, Wolters, & Baxter, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Winne & Hadwin, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Maranges et al. found that cognitive load can reduce the experience of physical and emotional feelings.

    “In short, their findings show that cognitive load can reduce the experience of physical and emotional feelings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Intrinsic load can be managed by simple-to-complex ordering of learning tasks.

    “Intrinsic load can be managed, for example, by simple-to-complex ordering of learning tasks (Pollock, Chandler, & Sweller, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pollock, Chandler, & Sweller, 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Extraneous load and intrinsic load must be lowered to free up processing resources necessary for learning when complex learning tasks are used.

    “Then, extraneous load and intrinsic load must be lowered to free up processing resources necessary for learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • May combine two claims. 24
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In CLT research, estimates mainly relate to ratings of invested mental effort as a proxy for overall cognitive load.

    “In CLT research, estimates mainly relate to ratings of invested mental effort as a proxy for overall cognitive load.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    When students' monitoring is poor, they will terminate study prematurely or study concepts that do not need restudying, jeopardizing their learning outcomes.

    “When students' monitoring is poor, they will terminate study prematurely or study concepts that do not need restudying.This will jeopardize their learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Students do not have direct access to the quality of their cognitive states, but need to infer cues informative of their learning and performance.

    “That is, students do not have direct access to the quality of their cognitive states, but need to infer cues informative of their learning and performance (Koriat, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Koriat, 1993 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Extraneous load is a result of superfluous processes that do not contribute to learning.

    “Extraneous load is a result of superfluous processes that do not contribute to learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Germane load is caused by effortful learning processes that deal with intrinsic cognitive load by adding elements to working memory that are relevant for learning.

    “Germane load, finally, is caused by effortful learning processes that deal with intrinsic cognitive load by adding elements to working memory that are relevant for learning, either from longterm memory (i.e., elaboration) or from the learning context (i.e., generalization from multiple cases).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These cue prompts can improve regulation of learning and lead to improved learning outcomes.

    “These cue prompts can also improve regulation of learning and lead to improved learning outcomes (Thiede et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Thiede et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These issues relate to models of instructional design and cognitive load, and models of Self-Regulated Learning.

    “Specifically, these issues relate to models of instructional design and cognitive load, which deal with learning in complex and information-rich environments (Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998), and models of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), which deal with students' monitoring and control of their learning processes (Bjork, Dunlosky, & Kornell, 2013;Winne & Hadwin, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bjork, Dunlosky, & Kornell, 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Winne & Hadwin, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cue diagnosticity and cue utilization are two important concepts to improve self-regulated learning.

    “Cue diagnosticity and cue utilization are thus two important concepts to improve self-regulated learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Specific to CLT research is its focus on learning to solve problems and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills; SRL research typically studies conceptual knowledge acquisition.

    “Specific to CLT research is its focus on learning to solve problems and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills (e.g., mathematics, science, engineering).By comparison, SRL research typically studies conceptual knowledge acquisition, such as vocabulary learning, idiom learning or text comprehension.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    An elemental independent variable in both CLT and SRL research is the subjective estimate students generate about their learning.

    “An elemental independent variable in both CLT and SRL research is the subjective estimate students generate about their learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Working memory load is affected by different processes yielding intrinsic, extraneous, or germane cognitive load.

    “Working memory load is affected by different processes yielding intrinsic, extraneous, or germane cognitive load (Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998;Van Merri€ enboer & Sweller, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Van Merri€ enboer & Sweller, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both age groups improved self-evaluations after performance feedback, although older children better discriminated between incorrect and correct responses and younger children continued to provide inappropriately high self-rewards after feedback.

    “Their results showed that both age groups improved self-evaluations after performance feedback, although the older children better discriminated between incorrect and correct responses and the younger children continued to provide inappropriately high self-rewards after feedback.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Loon et al. (2)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Negative feedback led to higher ratings of mental effort than positive feedback, despite the lack of differences in performance.

    “The results overall revealed that negative feedback led to higher ratings of mental effort than positive feedback, despite the lack of differences in performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Ackerman, 2015, Meta-Reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sidi et al. found that high cognitive load (through time pressure) or low perceived importance of the task compromised both cognitive and metacognitive processes when working on screen but not on paper.

    “Their results reveal that high cognitive load (through time pressure) or under low perceived importance of the task, working on screen but not on paper compromised both cognitive and metacognitive processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Intrinsic load is a direct function of the complexity of the performed task and the expertise of the learner; it cannot be altered without altering the task to be learned or by the act of learning itself.

    “Intrinsic load is a direct function of the complexity of the performed task and the expertise of the learner; it cannot be altered without altering the task to be learned (e.g., by simplification) or by the act of learning itself.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Use of diagnostic cues when monitoring learning leads to better regulation of learning activities and of mental resources allocated, and thus to more efficient learning and higher learning outcomes.

    “Use of these diagnostic cues when monitoring learning will lead to better regulation of learning activities and of mental resources allocated, and thus to more efficient learning and higher learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Germane load can be optimized by increasing variability over tasks and evoking self-explanation.

    “Germane load can be optimized, for example, by increasing variability over tasks (Paas and van Merri€ enboer, 1994) and evoking self-explanation (Gerjets, Scheiter, & Catrambone, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Paas and van Merri€ enboer, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gerjets, Scheiter, & Catrambone, 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Human expertise comes from knowledge organized by cognitive schemas, not from an ability to engage in reasoning with many elements that have not been organized in long-term memory.

    “Human expertise comes from knowledge organized by these schemas, not from an ability to engage in reasoning with many elements that have not been organized in long-term memory -human working memory simply is not able to process many elements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Both CLT and SRL research are based in the psychology of learning and memory, both use subjective estimates of learners about study behavior, and both focus on the self-directed learning situation.

    “Both are based in the psychology of learning and memory, both use subjective estimates of learners about study behavior (i.e., invested mental effort, judgments of learning), and both focus on the self-directed learning situation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Combining CLT and SRL research would allow for covering a broad range of learning tasks, relating to issues of self-regulation and design of instruction simultaneously.

    “Both CLT and SRL research have generated robust insights and combining them would allow for covering a broad range of learning tasks, relating to issues of self-regulation and design of instruction simultaneously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Effectively teaching yourself to program requires the ability to monitor own learning and the ability to control or regulate own behavior on the basis of rich and complex information.

    “Effectively teaching yourself to program thus requires the ability to monitor own learning and the ability to control or regulate own behavior on the basis of rich and complex information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This change in learning conditions changes the goals of education with less emphasis on transmission of information, and more emphasis on development of domain-general skills, such as literacy skills and self-directed learning skills.

    “This change in learning conditions changes the goals of education with less emphasis on transmission of information, and more emphasis on development of domain-general skills, such as literacy skills and self-directed learning skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Effective cue prompts when learning texts include generating keywords, providing summaries, and completing empty diagrams prior to monitoring learning.

    “Effective cue prompts when learning texts are generating keywords (Thiede et al., 2003), providing summaries (Thiede & Anderson, 2003), and completing empty diagrams of the texts (Van Loon et al., 2014) prior to monitoring learning of the texts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Thiede et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Thiede & Anderson, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Van Loon et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Working memory limitations only apply to novel information obtained through sensory memory; working memory has no known limitations when dealing with information retrieved from long-term memory.

    “The theory emphasizes that these working memory limitations only apply to novel information obtained through sensory memory.Working memory has no known limitations when dealing with information retrieved from long-term memory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Accurate monitoring and regulation of learning is paramount to optimizing learning and performance, but formal training is scarce.

    “Accurate monitoring and regulation of learning is paramount to optimizing learning and performance (Dunlosky & Rawson, 2012), but formal training is scarce (Bjork et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dunlosky & Rawson, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bjork et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In SRL research, subjective estimates relate to both the experienced level or quality of learning and to the next steps that learners consider needed in the learning process.

    “In SRL research, subjective estimates relate to both the experienced level or quality of learning (e.g., monitoring judgments) and to the next steps that learners consider needed in the learning process (e.g., control or regulation judgments).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This model emphasizes the need for unravelling cue use and designing effective cue prompts to improve cue use.

    “This model emphasizes the need for unravelling cue use and designing effective cue prompts to improve cue use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The amount of available information has increased dramatically, with more information produced in the last 30 years than in the 5000 preceding years.

    “According to estimations, more information has been produced in the last 30 years than in the 5000 preceding years (Jungwirth, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jungwirth, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Learning routine aspects of tasks requires prompts that generate cues about the fluency of these routine aspects.

    “For example, learning routine aspects of tasks will require prompts that generate cues about the fluency of these routine aspects (e.g, can they be performed effortless, fast, parallel to other tasks e performance accuracy as such is not a valid cue).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Maranges et al. (2017) demonstrate how affect plays a role in issues of self-regulation and cognitive load, and how these topics can be combined to come to a more holistic approach to SRL-CLT research.

    “The work by Maranges et al. (2017) is also relevant in relation to RQ 2b.It demonstrates how affect plays a role in issues of selfregulation and cognitive load, and how these topics can be combined to come to a more holistic approach to SRL-CLT research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In a future where massive amounts of information are continuously available, issues of self-regulated learning and cognitive load are omnipresent and will become inseparable.

    “In a future where massive amounts of information will be continuously available providing learners with abundant opportunities to self-teach knowledge and skills, issues of self-regulated learning and cognitive load are omnipresent and will become inseparable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Further development of objective measures of different types of cognitive load is required.

    “As indicated before, this also requires the further development of objective measures of e different types of e cognitive load, such as secondary task performance, eyetracking and pupillometric analysis, as well as physiological data such as heart rate, neuronal activity, or electrodermal activity (Korbach et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Korbach et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    A thorough analysis of both the criterion task and of the optimal way to generate cues that indicate where students stand in relation to the criterion task is needed to design effective cue prompts.

    “A thorough analysis of both the criterion task and of the optimal way to generate cues that indicate where students stand in relation to the criterion task is needed to design effective cue prompts (De Bruin et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites De Bruin et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Glogger-Frey et al. (2017) provide an example of how self-regulated learning might increase extraneous cognitive load, but improve awareness of knowledge gaps.

    “The study by Glogger-Frey et al. (2017) provides an interesting example of how self-regulated learning might increase extraneous cognitive load, but improve awareness of knowledge gaps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Self-teaching programming skills contains strong elements of self-regulated learning and of cognitive load.

    “As explained, self-teaching programming skills contains strong elements of self-regulated learning (e.g., it asks for continuous monitoring of goal achievement and regulation of learning activities) and of cognitive load (e.g., it requires individuals to manage their cognitive load effectively and efficiently; it is done on devices using multimedia).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The model presented in Fig. 2 can be used to determine diagnosticity and utilization of the cues generated through the prompt.

    “The model presented in Fig. 2 can then be used to determine diagnosticity and utilization of the cues generated through the prompt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Cue prompts can be used to teach students to accurately rate invested mental effort, and learn to distinguish between germane and intrinsic/germane load.

    “In relation to CLT aspects, cue prompts can be used to teach students to accurately rate invested mental effort, and learn to distinguish between germane and intrinsic/germane load; a distinction crucial for learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The diagnosticity and utilization of cues when monitoring and regulating learning, and when managing mental effort are essential to enable learners to cope and learn in such an environment.

    “We describe how the diagnosticity and utilization of cues when monitoring and regulating learning, and when managing mental effort are essential to enable learners to cope and learn in such an environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Objective measures may help to identify biases in learners' subjective measures.

    “Such objective measures may help to identify biases in learners' subjective measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Only when learners decide to invest mental effort when regulating learning, will learning outcomes improve.

    “Only when learners decide to invest mental effort when regulating learning, will learning outcomes improve.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The strength of combining CLT and SRL research paradigms would lie in enabling learners to use their estimates of both mental effort and learning to better regulate their learning processes when engaging in a broad range of tasks.

    “The strength of combining CLT and SRL research paradigms would lie in enabling learners to use their estimates of both mental effort and learning to better regulate their learning processes when engaging in a broad range of tasks (from vocabulary learning to complex skill acquisition).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The two elements of self-regulated learning and cognitive load in self-teaching programming skills are intricately related.

    “These two elements are intricately related and therefore should be studied simultaneously, as well as looking at the interaction between them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
42 of 42
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The different types of cognitive load are additive.

    “CLT assumes that the different types of cognitive load are additive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Students generally have difficulty monitoring their learning and making effective study decisions.

    “Students greatly vary how effective they are in steering their own learning, but generally, students have difficulty monitoring their learning and making effective study decisions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cues that students use are often not diagnostic of their actual learning.

    “Unfortunately, the cues that students use are often not diagnostic of their actual learning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A second threat to monitoring and regulation accuracy is a selection problem; when diagnostic cues are available but not used by students.

    “A second threat to monitoring and regulation accuracy is a selection problem; when diagnostic cues are available but not used by students.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Multimedia environments provide digital functionality to incorporate cue prompts and to provide feedback on the quality of the cues generated.

    “Multimedia environments provide digital functionality to incorporate cue prompts, but also to provide feedback on the quality of the cues generated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A mobile phone application can provide a summary of relevant data and analyze the discrepancy between students' reflection and actual learning.

    “If students, for example, at the end of a study day are asked to reflect on the quality of their learning, a mobile phone application can provide a summary of relevant data (e.g., length of study sessions, quality of summaries, and quiz performance) and analyze the discrepancy between students' reflection and actual learning.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • De Bruin and van Merriënboer (2017) suggested the use of Koriat's cue-utilisation framework (1997) as a bridge between cognitive load theory and models of self-regulated learning and as a basis for doing research on teaching self-regulation.

    “De Bruin and van Merriënboer (2017) suggested the use of Koriat ' s cue-utilisation framework (1997) as a bridge between cognitive load theory and models of self-regulated learning and as a basis for doing research on teaching self-regulation.”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as De Bruin and van Merriënboer (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
51
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2710084815
Cited by
146
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
14.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
cognitive load theory, student self-regulation, diagnostic cues, cognitive effort, learning monitoring, instructional design, lifelogging, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review