Bridging Cognitive Load and Self-Regulated Learning Research: A complementary approach to contemporary issues in educational research
Open accessAI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This editorial introduces a special issue arguing that cognitive load theory (CLT) and self-regulated learning (SRL) research can be combined into a joint paradigm, with the cue-utilization framework as a bridging basis. It proposes that learners need diagnostic cues to monitor learning and regulate mental effort, and it positions six studies and two commentaries as a first step toward that agenda.
Key findings
- The paper argues that CLT and SRL share common ground: both are based in learning and memory psychology, use subjective estimates such as mental effort and judgments of learning, and focus on self-directed learning.
- The cue-utilization framework is proposed as the main bridge: monitoring and regulation judgments are inferential, and accuracy depends on cue diagnosticity and cue utilization.
- The special issue contains six studies and two commentaries, organized around three research questions about what cues influence CL/SRL ratings, how cue use in CL and SRL is related, and how to design effective cue prompts.
- The editorial states that developing a combined CLT-SRL theoretical approach and research paradigm will probably take at least as long as the 25 years it took to bring CLT and SRL research to their current state.
Methods
- Design: conceptual/editorial introduction to a special issue, not an empirical study.
- The paper reviews fundamentals of CLT and SRL, analyzes similarities and differences, and presents the cue-utilization framework as a basis for integration.
- It then positions the six special-issue studies and two commentaries within a proposed joint CLT-SRL research agenda.
Limitations
- The paper states that the special-issue studies and commentaries “should be seen as a very first step” in executing the joint research agenda.
- It notes that the first two studies use tasks of relatively low ecological validity, though they are described as apt for answering the research questions.
- The paper reports Sweller and Paas’s commentary objection that combining SRL and CLT is difficult because self-regulation is considered a biologically primary skill and therefore unteachable, whereas CLT stresses biologically secondary, domain-specific knowledge requiring explicit instruction.
- Evident from the text: as an editorial, it presents no new empirical data and does not test the proposed joint paradigm directly.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationreasoning
CLT and SRL research can be combined into one joint research paradigm that is relevant for contemporary and future developments in education.
“can be combined into one joint research paradigm that is relevant for contemporary and future developments in education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In all SRL theories, monitoring and control of learning play a central role.
“Theories, however, show considerable overlap (e.g., Pintrich, Wolters, & Baxter, 2000;Winne & Hadwin, 2008) and in all of them monitoring and control (regulation) of learning play a central role.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pintrich, Wolters, & Baxter, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Winne & Hadwin, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Maranges et al. found that cognitive load can reduce the experience of physical and emotional feelings.
“In short, their findings show that cognitive load can reduce the experience of physical and emotional feelings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Intrinsic load can be managed by simple-to-complex ordering of learning tasks.
“Intrinsic load can be managed, for example, by simple-to-complex ordering of learning tasks (Pollock, Chandler, & Sweller, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pollock, Chandler, & Sweller, 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Extraneous load and intrinsic load must be lowered to free up processing resources necessary for learning when complex learning tasks are used.
“Then, extraneous load and intrinsic load must be lowered to free up processing resources necessary for learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Premisecitation
Schleinschok et al. found that students who generated drawings improved both their monitoring and regulation of learning more than those who did not generate drawings.
“They showed that students who generated drawings improved both their monitoring and regulation of learning more than those who did not generate drawings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cue-utilization framework is a particularly relevant bridging aspect to strengthen similarities and reduce differences between CLT and SRL.
“We argue that the cue-utilization framework described above is a particularly relevant bridging aspect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
SRL skills are trainable and improvable through practice.
“Contrary to what Sweller and Paas (2017) argue, we see evidence that SRL skills are trainable and improvable through practice (e.g., Thiede et al., 2003;Van Loon et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Thiede et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Loon et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Monitoring and regulation judgments are inferential in nature, depending on the cues students infer from available information when making metacognitive judgments.
“Within this framework, monitoring and regulation judgments are described as inferential in nature, depending on the cues students infer from available information when making metacognitive judgments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Koriat, 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Extraneous load can be reduced by instructional methods such as goal-free tasks, worked examples, completion tasks, integrating information sources, using multiple modalities, and reducing redundancy.
“Extraneous load can be reduced, for example, by the use of goal-free tasks (Ayres, 1993), worked examples (Renkl, 2002) and completion tasks (Van Merrienboer, Schuurman, de Croock, & Paas, 2002), by integrating different sources of information (Ginns, 2006), by using multiple modalities (Ginns, 2005), and by reducing redundancy (Diao & Sweller, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The studies by Schleinschok et al., Glogger-Frey et al., and Sidi et al. present interventions designed and tested to improve metacognitive monitoring, regulation, and performance.
“Schleinschok, Eitel, and Scheiter (3), Glogger-Frey, Gaus and Renkl (4) and Sidi,Shpigelman,Zalmanov,and Ackerman (5) present studies in which interventions are designed and tested that aim to improve metacognitive monitoring, regulation, and performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Cue prompts are needed to improve use of diagnostic cues when judging monitoring and regulation of learning.
“Cue prompts are therefore needed to improve use of diagnostic cues when judging monitoring and regulation of learning (e.g., Thiede, Anderson, & Therriault, 2003;Van Loon, De Bruin, Van Gog, Van Merri€ enboer, & Dunlosky, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Thiede, Anderson, & Therriault, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Loon, De Bruin, Van Gog, Van Merri€ enboer, & Dunlosky, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The cue-utilization framework can be used as the basis for a joint CLT-SRL research paradigm.
“describes how the cue-utilization framework can be used as the basis for a joint research paradigm.”
- Also stated in: § 4. Similarities and differences between CLT and SRL: bridging the gap · plain
“We argue that the cue-utilization framework described above is a particularly relevant bridging aspect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4. Similarities and differences between CLT and SRL: bridging the gap · plain
- Premisecitation
Working memory capacity is limited by storage, duration, and possibly other cognitive mechanisms.
“The capacity of working memory is limited by storage (i.e., only a very small number of information elements can be simultaneously active), duration (i.e., information elements quickly decay unless they are refreshed by rehearsal), and possibly other cognitive mechanisms (Shipstead, Lindsey, Marshall, & Engle, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shipstead, Lindsey, Marshall, & Engle, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Glogger-Frey et al. found that self-regulated activities led to higher performance on transfer problems than worked examples.
“Their findings show that selfregulated activities led to higher performance on transfer problems than worked examples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Van Loon et al. (2014) show how a diagram cue prompt improved cue diagnosticity, cue utilization, and monitoring accuracy after studying cause-and-effect texts.
“Van Loon et al. (2014) show how a diagram cue prompt improved cue diagnosticity, cue utilization, and monitoring accuracy after studying cause-and-effect texts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Loon et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Metacognitive cues play an essential role in optimizing the quality of both monitoring judgments and mental effort ratings.
“As the studies in this special issue demonstrate, metacognitive cues play an essential role in optimizing the quality of both monitoring judgments and mental effort ratings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
To a lesser extent, actual effects on learning outcomes have been shown in SRL research, which are essential to validate the effect of interventions.
“To a lesser extent, actual effects on learning outcomes have been shown, which are essential to validate the effect of interventions (e.g., Koriat & Bjork, 2006;Lauterman & Ackerman, 2014;Thiede et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Koriat & Bjork, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lauterman & Ackerman, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thiede et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Monitoring learning of conceptual information is aided by cue prompts that generate information about understanding of the conceptual information.
“In contrast, monitoring learning of conceptual information will be aided by cue prompts that generate information about understanding of the conceptual information (e.g., making summaries, keywords, diagrams e ease of processing is not a valid cue).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Schleinschok et al. (2017) did not manipulate factors that potentially contribute to the correlation between JOLs, CL ratings, and performance, such as timing and frequency.
“The study by Schleinschok et al. (2017) examines how JOLs, CL ratings, and performance correlate, although they do not manipulate factors that potentially contribute to that correlation such as timing and frequency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Teaching students to use diagnostic cues is mostly an issue of helping students filter the diagnostic cues from the non-diagnostic ones.
“The programming skills example demonstrates that teaching students to use diagnostic cues is mostly an issue of helping students filter the diagnostic cues from the non-diagnostic ones, given that a broad array of cues (from feedback but also subjective cues) will be available at any point in time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The concepts of cues, monitoring, and regulation apply similarly to reasoning and problem-solving tasks outside traditional verbal and textual learning tasks.
“Work within the Meta-Reasoning Framework is worth mentioning here (Ackerman & Thompson, 2015;in press), as it shows that outside the traditional verbal and textual learning tasks, the concepts of cues, monitoring, and regulation apply similarly to reasoning and problem-solving tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ackerman & Thompson, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites in press
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The design of the cue prompt directly depends on the criterion task.
“As described by Van Merri€ enboer (2016), the design of the cue prompt directly depends on the criterion task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Merri€ enboer (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
SRL and CLT are sufficiently similar to warrant exploration of a joined research paradigm.
“As such, we argue that SRL and CLT are sufficiently similar to warrant exploration of a joined research paradigm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Interventions to improve monitoring and regulation are domain-specific and dependent on the criterion learning task.
“SRL research shows that interventions to improve monitoring and regulation are domain-specific and dependent on the criterion learning task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Maranges et al.'s approach shows that when emotional processes are involved, it is a matter of directly influencing SRL and CL, not only eliciting explicit monitoring/mental effort judgments.
“Their approach shows that it is not only a matter of eliciting explicit monitoring/mental effort judgments, but when emotional processes are involved also a matter of directly influencing SRL and CL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Monitoring and regulating learning in academic settings requires practice and instruction.
“Similarly, even though children's ability to regulate behavior develops with age, monitoring and regulating learning in academic settings requires practice and instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
- May combine two claims. 24
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn CLT research, estimates mainly relate to ratings of invested mental effort as a proxy for overall cognitive load.
“In CLT research, estimates mainly relate to ratings of invested mental effort as a proxy for overall cognitive load.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningWhen students' monitoring is poor, they will terminate study prematurely or study concepts that do not need restudying, jeopardizing their learning outcomes.
“When students' monitoring is poor, they will terminate study prematurely or study concepts that do not need restudying.This will jeopardize their learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudents do not have direct access to the quality of their cognitive states, but need to infer cues informative of their learning and performance.
“That is, students do not have direct access to the quality of their cognitive states, but need to infer cues informative of their learning and performance (Koriat, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Koriat, 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenExtraneous load is a result of superfluous processes that do not contribute to learning.
“Extraneous load is a result of superfluous processes that do not contribute to learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenGermane load is caused by effortful learning processes that deal with intrinsic cognitive load by adding elements to working memory that are relevant for learning.
“Germane load, finally, is caused by effortful learning processes that deal with intrinsic cognitive load by adding elements to working memory that are relevant for learning, either from longterm memory (i.e., elaboration) or from the learning context (i.e., generalization from multiple cases).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese cue prompts can improve regulation of learning and lead to improved learning outcomes.
“These cue prompts can also improve regulation of learning and lead to improved learning outcomes (Thiede et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thiede et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese issues relate to models of instructional design and cognitive load, and models of Self-Regulated Learning.
“Specifically, these issues relate to models of instructional design and cognitive load, which deal with learning in complex and information-rich environments (Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998), and models of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), which deal with students' monitoring and control of their learning processes (Bjork, Dunlosky, & Kornell, 2013;Winne & Hadwin, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bjork, Dunlosky, & Kornell, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Winne & Hadwin, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCue diagnosticity and cue utilization are two important concepts to improve self-regulated learning.
“Cue diagnosticity and cue utilization are thus two important concepts to improve self-regulated learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSpecific to CLT research is its focus on learning to solve problems and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills; SRL research typically studies conceptual knowledge acquisition.
“Specific to CLT research is its focus on learning to solve problems and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills (e.g., mathematics, science, engineering).By comparison, SRL research typically studies conceptual knowledge acquisition, such as vocabulary learning, idiom learning or text comprehension.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAn elemental independent variable in both CLT and SRL research is the subjective estimate students generate about their learning.
“An elemental independent variable in both CLT and SRL research is the subjective estimate students generate about their learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationWorking memory load is affected by different processes yielding intrinsic, extraneous, or germane cognitive load.
“Working memory load is affected by different processes yielding intrinsic, extraneous, or germane cognitive load (Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998;Van Merri€ enboer & Sweller, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sweller, van Merri€ enboer, & Paas, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Merri€ enboer & Sweller, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth age groups improved self-evaluations after performance feedback, although older children better discriminated between incorrect and correct responses and younger children continued to provide inappropriately high self-rewards after feedback.
“Their results showed that both age groups improved self-evaluations after performance feedback, although the older children better discriminated between incorrect and correct responses and the younger children continued to provide inappropriately high self-rewards after feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Loon et al. (2)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNegative feedback led to higher ratings of mental effort than positive feedback, despite the lack of differences in performance.
“The results overall revealed that negative feedback led to higher ratings of mental effort than positive feedback, despite the lack of differences in performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Ackerman, 2015, Meta-Reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSidi et al. found that high cognitive load (through time pressure) or low perceived importance of the task compromised both cognitive and metacognitive processes when working on screen but not on paper.
“Their results reveal that high cognitive load (through time pressure) or under low perceived importance of the task, working on screen but not on paper compromised both cognitive and metacognitive processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIntrinsic load is a direct function of the complexity of the performed task and the expertise of the learner; it cannot be altered without altering the task to be learned or by the act of learning itself.
“Intrinsic load is a direct function of the complexity of the performed task and the expertise of the learner; it cannot be altered without altering the task to be learned (e.g., by simplification) or by the act of learning itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningUse of diagnostic cues when monitoring learning leads to better regulation of learning activities and of mental resources allocated, and thus to more efficient learning and higher learning outcomes.
“Use of these diagnostic cues when monitoring learning will lead to better regulation of learning activities and of mental resources allocated, and thus to more efficient learning and higher learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGermane load can be optimized by increasing variability over tasks and evoking self-explanation.
“Germane load can be optimized, for example, by increasing variability over tasks (Paas and van Merri€ enboer, 1994) and evoking self-explanation (Gerjets, Scheiter, & Catrambone, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Paas and van Merri€ enboer, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gerjets, Scheiter, & Catrambone, 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningHuman expertise comes from knowledge organized by cognitive schemas, not from an ability to engage in reasoning with many elements that have not been organized in long-term memory.
“Human expertise comes from knowledge organized by these schemas, not from an ability to engage in reasoning with many elements that have not been organized in long-term memory -human working memory simply is not able to process many elements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBoth CLT and SRL research are based in the psychology of learning and memory, both use subjective estimates of learners about study behavior, and both focus on the self-directed learning situation.
“Both are based in the psychology of learning and memory, both use subjective estimates of learners about study behavior (i.e., invested mental effort, judgments of learning), and both focus on the self-directed learning situation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCombining CLT and SRL research would allow for covering a broad range of learning tasks, relating to issues of self-regulation and design of instruction simultaneously.
“Both CLT and SRL research have generated robust insights and combining them would allow for covering a broad range of learning tasks, relating to issues of self-regulation and design of instruction simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEffectively teaching yourself to program requires the ability to monitor own learning and the ability to control or regulate own behavior on the basis of rich and complex information.
“Effectively teaching yourself to program thus requires the ability to monitor own learning and the ability to control or regulate own behavior on the basis of rich and complex information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis change in learning conditions changes the goals of education with less emphasis on transmission of information, and more emphasis on development of domain-general skills, such as literacy skills and self-directed learning skills.
“This change in learning conditions changes the goals of education with less emphasis on transmission of information, and more emphasis on development of domain-general skills, such as literacy skills and self-directed learning skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEffective cue prompts when learning texts include generating keywords, providing summaries, and completing empty diagrams prior to monitoring learning.
“Effective cue prompts when learning texts are generating keywords (Thiede et al., 2003), providing summaries (Thiede & Anderson, 2003), and completing empty diagrams of the texts (Van Loon et al., 2014) prior to monitoring learning of the texts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Thiede et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thiede & Anderson, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Loon et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWorking memory limitations only apply to novel information obtained through sensory memory; working memory has no known limitations when dealing with information retrieved from long-term memory.
“The theory emphasizes that these working memory limitations only apply to novel information obtained through sensory memory.Working memory has no known limitations when dealing with information retrieved from long-term memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccurate monitoring and regulation of learning is paramount to optimizing learning and performance, but formal training is scarce.
“Accurate monitoring and regulation of learning is paramount to optimizing learning and performance (Dunlosky & Rawson, 2012), but formal training is scarce (Bjork et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dunlosky & Rawson, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bjork et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn SRL research, subjective estimates relate to both the experienced level or quality of learning and to the next steps that learners consider needed in the learning process.
“In SRL research, subjective estimates relate to both the experienced level or quality of learning (e.g., monitoring judgments) and to the next steps that learners consider needed in the learning process (e.g., control or regulation judgments).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis model emphasizes the need for unravelling cue use and designing effective cue prompts to improve cue use.
“This model emphasizes the need for unravelling cue use and designing effective cue prompts to improve cue use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe amount of available information has increased dramatically, with more information produced in the last 30 years than in the 5000 preceding years.
“According to estimations, more information has been produced in the last 30 years than in the 5000 preceding years (Jungwirth, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jungwirth, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLearning routine aspects of tasks requires prompts that generate cues about the fluency of these routine aspects.
“For example, learning routine aspects of tasks will require prompts that generate cues about the fluency of these routine aspects (e.g, can they be performed effortless, fast, parallel to other tasks e performance accuracy as such is not a valid cue).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMaranges et al. (2017) demonstrate how affect plays a role in issues of self-regulation and cognitive load, and how these topics can be combined to come to a more holistic approach to SRL-CLT research.
“The work by Maranges et al. (2017) is also relevant in relation to RQ 2b.It demonstrates how affect plays a role in issues of selfregulation and cognitive load, and how these topics can be combined to come to a more holistic approach to SRL-CLT research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn a future where massive amounts of information are continuously available, issues of self-regulated learning and cognitive load are omnipresent and will become inseparable.
“In a future where massive amounts of information will be continuously available providing learners with abundant opportunities to self-teach knowledge and skills, issues of self-regulated learning and cognitive load are omnipresent and will become inseparable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationFurther development of objective measures of different types of cognitive load is required.
“As indicated before, this also requires the further development of objective measures of e different types of e cognitive load, such as secondary task performance, eyetracking and pupillometric analysis, as well as physiological data such as heart rate, neuronal activity, or electrodermal activity (Korbach et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Korbach et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationA thorough analysis of both the criterion task and of the optimal way to generate cues that indicate where students stand in relation to the criterion task is needed to design effective cue prompts.
“A thorough analysis of both the criterion task and of the optimal way to generate cues that indicate where students stand in relation to the criterion task is needed to design effective cue prompts (De Bruin et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites De Bruin et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGlogger-Frey et al. (2017) provide an example of how self-regulated learning might increase extraneous cognitive load, but improve awareness of knowledge gaps.
“The study by Glogger-Frey et al. (2017) provides an interesting example of how self-regulated learning might increase extraneous cognitive load, but improve awareness of knowledge gaps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSelf-teaching programming skills contains strong elements of self-regulated learning and of cognitive load.
“As explained, self-teaching programming skills contains strong elements of self-regulated learning (e.g., it asks for continuous monitoring of goal achievement and regulation of learning activities) and of cognitive load (e.g., it requires individuals to manage their cognitive load effectively and efficiently; it is done on devices using multimedia).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe model presented in Fig. 2 can be used to determine diagnosticity and utilization of the cues generated through the prompt.
“The model presented in Fig. 2 can then be used to determine diagnosticity and utilization of the cues generated through the prompt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCue prompts can be used to teach students to accurately rate invested mental effort, and learn to distinguish between germane and intrinsic/germane load.
“In relation to CLT aspects, cue prompts can be used to teach students to accurately rate invested mental effort, and learn to distinguish between germane and intrinsic/germane load; a distinction crucial for learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe diagnosticity and utilization of cues when monitoring and regulating learning, and when managing mental effort are essential to enable learners to cope and learn in such an environment.
“We describe how the diagnosticity and utilization of cues when monitoring and regulating learning, and when managing mental effort are essential to enable learners to cope and learn in such an environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningObjective measures may help to identify biases in learners' subjective measures.
“Such objective measures may help to identify biases in learners' subjective measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOnly when learners decide to invest mental effort when regulating learning, will learning outcomes improve.
“Only when learners decide to invest mental effort when regulating learning, will learning outcomes improve.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe strength of combining CLT and SRL research paradigms would lie in enabling learners to use their estimates of both mental effort and learning to better regulate their learning processes when engaging in a broad range of tasks.
“The strength of combining CLT and SRL research paradigms would lie in enabling learners to use their estimates of both mental effort and learning to better regulate their learning processes when engaging in a broad range of tasks (from vocabulary learning to complex skill acquisition).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe two elements of self-regulated learning and cognitive load in self-teaching programming skills are intricately related.
“These two elements are intricately related and therefore should be studied simultaneously, as well as looking at the interaction between them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The different types of cognitive load are additive.
“CLT assumes that the different types of cognitive load are additive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students generally have difficulty monitoring their learning and making effective study decisions.
“Students greatly vary how effective they are in steering their own learning, but generally, students have difficulty monitoring their learning and making effective study decisions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cues that students use are often not diagnostic of their actual learning.
“Unfortunately, the cues that students use are often not diagnostic of their actual learning.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A second threat to monitoring and regulation accuracy is a selection problem; when diagnostic cues are available but not used by students.
“A second threat to monitoring and regulation accuracy is a selection problem; when diagnostic cues are available but not used by students.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Multimedia environments provide digital functionality to incorporate cue prompts and to provide feedback on the quality of the cues generated.
“Multimedia environments provide digital functionality to incorporate cue prompts, but also to provide feedback on the quality of the cues generated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A mobile phone application can provide a summary of relevant data and analyze the discrepancy between students' reflection and actual learning.
“If students, for example, at the end of a study day are asked to reflect on the quality of their learning, a mobile phone application can provide a summary of relevant data (e.g., length of study sessions, quality of summaries, and quiz performance) and analyze the discrepancy between students' reflection and actual learning.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
De Bruin and van Merriënboer (2017) suggested the use of Koriat's cue-utilisation framework (1997) as a bridge between cognitive load theory and models of self-regulated learning and as a basis for doing research on teaching self-regulation.
“De Bruin and van Merriënboer (2017) suggested the use of Koriat ' s cue-utilisation framework (1997) as a bridge between cognitive load theory and models of self-regulated learning and as a basis for doing research on teaching self-regulation.”
From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as De Bruin and van Merriënboer (2017)
Cites
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) was initially developed in the 1980s (Sweller, 1988).”
BackgroundCognitive Architecture and Instructional Design
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1022193728205 · Cited by 6,023 · see citing works
Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings
Nelson, T. O. (1990) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60053-5 · Cited by 2,583 · see citing works
Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 · Cited by 2,206 · see citing works
Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 · Cited by 2,150 · see citing works
Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. T., & Graesser, A. C. (1998) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410602350 · Cited by 2,138 · see citing works
Studying as Self-Regulated Learning
(1998) · Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice · doi:10.4324/9781410602350-19 · Cited by 1,589 · see citing works
Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning
Koriat, A. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122 · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.490 · Cited by 1,062 · see citing works
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089303500412 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and Education
Cowan, N. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y · Cited by 899 · see citing works
How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing
Koriat, A. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.609 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. J. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Assimilating complex information
Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00016-0 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Dunlosky, J. T., & Rawson, K. A. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of the modality effect
Ginns, P. (2005) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load
Leppink, J., Paas, F., van Gog, T., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.001 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research
van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701756248 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations
Renkl, A. (2002) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00030-5 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition
Schraw, G. J., & Impara, J. C. (2000) · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects
Ginns, P. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001 · Cited by 403 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Extraneous load can be reduced, for example, by the use of goal-free tasks (Ayres, 1993), worked examples (Renkl, 2002) and completion tasks (Van Merrienboer, Schuurman, de Croock, & Paas, 2002), by integrating different sources of information (Ginns, 2006), by using multiple modalities (Ginns, 2005), and by reducing…”
MethodPaas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Aubteen Darabi, A. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504795 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control
Shipstead, Z., Lindsey, D. R. B., Marshall, R. L., & Engle, R. W. (2014) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.004 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1250 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., de Croock, M. B. M., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (2002) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00020-2 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy
Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0361-476x(02)00011-5 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Schmeck, A., Opfermann, M., van Gog, T., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Leutner, D. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9328-3 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.
Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E., & Kidder, D. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.22 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.007 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom
de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Gog, T. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.01.003 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203096864 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Differentiating Different Types of Cognitive Load: a Comparison of Different Measures
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9404-8 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Mending metacognitive illusions: A comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1133 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Diao, Y., & Sweller, J. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.007 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration
Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Kalyuga, S., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9195-x · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.
Hertzog, C. K., Dunlosky, J. T., Robinson, A. E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.22 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Monitoring and regulation of learning in medical education: The need for predictive cues
de Bruin, A. B. H., Dunlosky, J., & Cavalcanti, R. B. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13267 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2015) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2015.21.5 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing
Sidi, Y., Shpigelman, M., Zalmanov, H., & Ackerman, R. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.002 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Glogger‐Frey, I., Gaus, K., & Renkl, A. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.002 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Do drawing tasks improve monitoring and control during learning from text?
Schleinschok, K., Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.02.002 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Why goal-free problems can facilitate learning
Ayres, P. L. (1993) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1993.1027 · Cited by 77 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Extraneous load can be reduced, for example, by the use of goal-free tasks (Ayres, 1993), worked examples (Renkl, 2002) and completion tasks (Van Merrienboer, Schuurman, de Croock, & Paas, 2002), by integrating different sources of information (Ginns, 2006), by using multiple modalities (Ginns, 2005), and by reducing…”
Instructional Implications of David C. Geary's Evolutionary Educational Psychology
Sweller, J. (2008) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520802392208 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B. H., van Gog, T., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Dunlosky, J. (2014) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.007 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Comparing cognitive load and self-regulatory depletion: Effects on emotions and cognitions
Maranges, H. M., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.010 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Socio-technical Lifelogging: Deriving Design Principles For A Future Proof Digital Past
(2012) · SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) · doi:10.1080/07370024.2012.656071 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Effects of performance feedback valence on perceptions of invested mental effort
Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Schaap, L., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & van Gog, T. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.002 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items
Undorf, M., & Ackerman, R. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1261-4 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0351-4 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Information Overload: Threat or Opportunity?.
Jungwirth, B., & Bruce, B. C. (2002) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Meta-reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory?
Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. A. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315819525-17 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Naturalistic Recognition of Activities and Mood Using Wearable Electronics
Zhu, Z. Z., Satizábal, H. F., Blanke, U., Pérez-Uribe, A., & Tröster, G. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2015.2491927 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Meta-Reasoning : Shedding metacognitive light on reasoning research
Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. A. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315725697-1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
van Loon, M. H., Destan, N., Spiess, M. A., de Bruin, A. B. H., & Roebers, C. M. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.011 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118736494.ch2 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5 · Cited by 2,337 · see citing works
Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load
Seufert, T. (2018) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.004 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Dong, A., Jong, M. S., & King, R. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Synthesizing Cognitive Load and Self-regulation Theory: a Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda
de Bruin, A. B. H., Roelle, J., Carpenter, S. K., Baars, M., & EFG-MRE (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09576-4 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Teachers’ and Students’ Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning
Lawson, M. J., Vosniadou, S., Deur, P. V., Wyra, M., & Jeffries, D. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9453-7 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Lai, C., Hwang, G., & Tu, Y.-H. (2018) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9585-y · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Vosniadou, S., Darmawan, I., Lawson, M. J., Deur, P. V., Jeffries, D., & Wyra, M. (2021) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-020-09258-0 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Seufert, T. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09574-6 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Faber, T. J. E., Dankbaar, M. E. W., van den Broek, W. W., Bruinink, L. J., Hogeveen, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05698-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The Interplay of Cognitive Load, Learners’ Resources and Self-regulation
Seufert, T., Hamm, V., Vogt, A., & Riemer, V. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09890-1 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Understanding effort regulation: Comparing ‘Pomodoro’ breaks and self‐regulated breaks
Biwer, F., Wiradhany, W., Egbrink, M. G. A. O., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12593 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Looking at Mental Effort Appraisals through a Metacognitive Lens: Are they Biased?
Scheiter, K., Ackerman, R., & Hoogerheide, V. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09555-9 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
How Does Cognitive Load Interact with Self-Regulated Learning? A Dynamic and Integrative Model
Wang, T., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09794-6 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Le, Y., Liu, J., Deng, C., & Dai, D. Y. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.037 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Rubrics enhance accuracy and reduce cognitive load in self-assessment
Krebs, R., Rothstein, B., & Roelle, J. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09302-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Different effects of pausing on cognitive load in a medical simulation game
Lee, J. Y., Donkers, J. H. H. L. M., Jarodzka, H., Sellenraad, G., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106385 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Larmuseau, C., Vanneste, P., Cornelis, J. P., Desmet, P., & Depaepe, F. (2019) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v7i2.403 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Effects of self-assessment feedback on self-assessment and task-selection accuracy
Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., PAAS, F. G. W. C., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2019) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-019-09189-5 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Should self-regulated learning be integrated with cognitive load theory? A commentary
Sweller, J., & Paas, F. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.005 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Roebers, C. M., Mayer, B., Steiner, M., Bayard, N. S., & van Loon, M. H. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000776 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Cognitive load and self-regulation: Attempts to build a bridge
Boekaerts, M. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.001 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Verstege, S., Pijeira‐Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Diederen, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.020 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Something old, something new from cognitive load theory
Ayres, P. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106503 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Laer, S. V., & Elen, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.016 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Measuring Cognitive Load in Virtual Reality Training via Pupillometry
Lee, J. Y., de Jong, N., Donkers, J. H. H. L. M., Jarodzka, H. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3326473 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The medical pause: Importance, processes and training
Lee, J. Y., Szulewski, A., Young, J. Q., Donkers, J. H. H. L. M., Jarodzka, H. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2021) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14529 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Hoch, E., Sidi, Y., Ackerman, R., Hoogerheide, V., & Scheiter, K. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09779-5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Nachtigall, V., Serova, K., & Rummel, N. (2020) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09525-2 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., Biwer, F., Janssen, E. M., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2022) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09692-3 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Wang, T., Li, S., Tan, C., Zhang, J., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104924 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Park, B., Korbach, A., & Brünken, R. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Dever, D. A., Amon, M. J., Vrzáková, H., Wiedbusch, M. D., Cloude, E. B., & Azevedo, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813677 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Dr., O. A. E. S. P., & Indrawati, C. D. S. (2021) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2021.1449a · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Wang, T., Zheng, J., Tan, C., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12824 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Mavilidi, M. F., & Zhong, L. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09463-7 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Yilmaz-Na, E., & Sönmez, E. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104683 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Schuster, C., Stebner, F., Geukes, S., Jansen, M., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101708 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.021 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of Interventions for Monitoring Accuracy in Problem Solving
Janssen, N., & Lazonder, A. W. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09936-4 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Optimizing self-regulation of performance: is mental effort a cue?
Blissett, S., Sibbald, M., Kok, E. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-018-9838-x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Wang, T., Li, S., Huang, X., Pan, Z., & Lajoie, S. P. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11357-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Identifying indicators to guide adaptive scaffolding in games
Faber, T. J. E., Dankbaar, M. E. W., Kickert, R., van den Broek, W. W., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101666 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
David, L., Biwer, F., Baars, M., Wijnia, L., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09903-z · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Revisiting the debate on germane cognitive load versus germane resources
Greenberg, K., & Zheng, R. Z. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2022.2159416 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Liebenow, L. W., Schmidt, F. T. C., Meyer, J., & Fleckenstein, J. (2025) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105385 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Wu, X.-Y., Radloff, J., Yeter, I. H., Wang, L., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2563086 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Sepp, S., Wong, M., Hoogerheide, V., & Castro-Alonso, J. C. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12715 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wang, T., Li, S., Huang, X., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10222-3 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Subramani, M., Wagle, M., Ray, G., & Gupta, A. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15635 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Uus, Õ., Seitlinger, P. C., & Ley, T. T. (2020) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103089 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17093869 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ninghardjanti, P., & Dirgatama, C. H. A. (2021) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23801 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Huang, X., Li, S., Wang, T., Pan, Z., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12827 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Who’s in Charge?—Dealing with the Self-regulation Dilemma in Digital Learning Environments
Bergamin, P. B., & Hirt, F. S. (2018) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73546-7_14 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A comparison of non-verbal and verbal indicators of young children’s metacognition
Roebers, C. M., Kälin, S., & Aeschlimann, E. A. (2019) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-019-09217-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Tuti, T., Paton, C., & Winters, N. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104136 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Goal choice in preschoolers is influenced by context, cognitive flexibility, and metacognition
LeClercq, M., Gimenes, G., Maintenant, C., & Clerc, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063566 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Vocational Education and Training in the Age of Digitization
Wuttke, E., Seifried, J., Niegemann, H. M., & Budrich, V. B. (2020) · Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks · doi:10.3224/84742432 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Wirth, J., Weber-Reuter, X.-L., Schuster, C., Fleischer, J., Leutner, D., & Stebner, F. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09983-x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Jimmy Zambrano, R., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12603 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Hughes, C., Costley, J., & Lange, C. H. (2018) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-03-2018-0018 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Metacognitive Training and Online Community College Students’ Learning Calibration and Performance
Emory, B., & Luo, T. (2020) · Community College Journal of Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/10668926.2020.1841042 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Learner Control Aids Learning from Instructional Videos with a Virtual Human
Schroeder, N. L., Chin, J., & Craig, S. D. (2019) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-019-09417-6 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Molin, F., de Bruin, A. B. H., & Haelermans, C. (2022) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100323 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Grundgeiger, T., Ertle, F., Diethei, D., Mengelkamp, C., & Held, V. (2022) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-022-10148-0 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Schnaubert, L., & Schneider, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.648319 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Waldeyer, J., Endres, T., Roelle, J., Baars, M., & Renkl, A. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09944-4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Immediate Learning Benefits of Retrieval Tasks
Endres, T., Kubik, V., Koslowski, K., Hahne, F., & Renkl, A. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000280 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
de Bruin, A. B. H., Janssen, E. M., Waldeyer, J., & Stebner, F. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10042-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The role of feedback and working memory for goal-related monitoring and goal revision
Theobald, M., & Brod, G. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102108 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Yan, Y.-M., Zheng, Y., & Ye, X. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13070-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Role of Parents and Teachers in Fostering Children’s Self-regulated Learning Skills
Dermitzaki, I., & Kallia, E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51673-4_9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cognitive Load Optimization – a Statistical Evaluation for three STEM Disciplines
Stanislaw Paul, M. A. J. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale48869.2020.9368430 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
How does the Dunning-Kruger effect happen in creativity? The creative self-concept matters
Yang, X., Xu, F., Qin, K., Yu, Y., Zheng, Q., Zhu, A., Hu, B., & Gu, C. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101638 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
How to support self-assessment through standards in dissimilar-solution-tasks
Froese, L., & Roelle, J. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101998 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Autonomic Nervous Pattern Recognition of Students’ Learning States in Real Classroom Situation
Chen, S., Hu, Z., Li, S., Hu, X., Liu, G., & Wen, W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2021.3132957 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Melzner, N., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09316-9 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Chen, S.-Y., & Chen, W. (2025) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.70184 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Cognitive Skills in Adolescents’ Self-Directed Learning Efficacy
Uus, Õ., Mettis, K., & Väljataga, T. (2022) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2022.132035 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Cognitive Load Self-Management Principle in Multimedia Learning
Zhang, S., de Koning, B. B., Agostinho, S., Tindall‐Ford, S., Chandler, P., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108894333.044 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-directed learning: A case-study of school students scientific knowledge construction outdoors
Uus, Õ., Mettis, K., & Väljataga, T. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2074342 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wang, T., Ruiz‐Segura, A., Li, S., & Lajoie, S. P. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13043 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Barz, N., Benick, M., Dörrenbächer‐Ulrich, L., & Perels, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1445182 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Lange, C. H., Gorbunova, A., Щеглова, И. А., & Costley, J. (2022) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2022.2130395 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Dumitru, C., Stan, M. M., & Dumitru, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1256960 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Development, testing, and application of a mathematics learning scale of self-direction
Lin, C.-H., & Chen, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145442 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
In experts’ words: Translating theory to practice for teaching self-regulated learning
Isbej, L., Waterval, D. G. J., Riquelme, A. J., Véliz, C., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2024) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2359970 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Using digital formative assessments to improve learning in physics education
Molin, F. (2021) · doi:10.26481/dis.20220114fm · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Scheiter, K. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10037-z · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Fernández-Ortube, A., Zamorano, D., Pinedo, L., Sánchez‐Iglesias, I., & Barrenetxea-Mínguez, L. (2025) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102808 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Impact of cognitive load associated with learning and using parametric tools in architectural design
Dissaux, T., & Jancart, S. (2022) · Congreso Internacional de Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica (EGA) · doi:10.31428/10317/11415 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Automated generators of examples and problems for studying computer algorithms
Lui, A. K.-F., Poon, M. H. M., & Wong, R. M. H. (2019) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-10-2018-0091 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Artino, A. R., Gavarkovs, A. G., Brydges, R., & Gruppen, L. D. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119839446.ch24 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Al-Sulaimi, A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2017) · Information and Communication Technologies and Accessibility · doi:10.1109/icta.2017.8336053 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Differences in Self-Directed Learning: Middle-School Students’ Autonomous Outdoor Studying
Uus, Õ., Mettis, K., Väljataga, T., & Ley, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.718295 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Medical Pause in Simulation Training
Lee, J. Y. (2022) · doi:10.26481/dis.20220608jl · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Scaffolding self-regulated learning through Android-based mobile media on hormone system
Rahayu, S., Dewahrani, Y. R., Nurkhofiyya, A., & Ristanto, . H. (2021) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0041777 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kolloff, K., Ger, E., & Roebers, C. M. (2025) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-025-09422-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Facilitating student learning: An instructional design perspective for health professions educators
Noushad, B., & Khurshid, F. (2019) · Research and Development in Medical Education · doi:10.15171/rdme.2019.014 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2710084815
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 14.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- cognitive load theory, student self-regulation, diagnostic cues, cognitive effort, learning monitoring, instructional design, lifelogging, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review